Cams and Heads
#21
RE: Cams and Heads
ORIGINAL: omer333
4.5 litre, that would be maybe a 270 cubic inch engine right?
Oh how I miss cubic inches instead of litres!
Seriously. I grew up hearing 305, 302, 350, 351, 400, 427, 454, 440, etc. Now it's 2.0, 2.3, 5.0, 5.7, 4.0, 4.6, 3.5, etc. I feel like I'm not even talking about an engine anymore. Could we please go back to cubic inches!?!?!?!
That was a rant at the world, not at any of you.
ORIGINAL: fazm
just fyi, the 4.5 stroker with a forged rotating assembly would be 8K+ from them, i already asked lol
just fyi, the 4.5 stroker with a forged rotating assembly would be 8K+ from them, i already asked lol
Oh how I miss cubic inches instead of litres!
Seriously. I grew up hearing 305, 302, 350, 351, 400, 427, 454, 440, etc. Now it's 2.0, 2.3, 5.0, 5.7, 4.0, 4.6, 3.5, etc. I feel like I'm not even talking about an engine anymore. Could we please go back to cubic inches!?!?!?!
That was a rant at the world, not at any of you.
At least we're not in the import world and have a 1.8L... it sounds like someone already drank some of our bottle of coke!
#22
RE: Cams and Heads
ORIGINAL: hamidlmt
Amen to that!
At least we're not in the import world and have a 1.8L... it sounds like someone already drank some of our bottle of coke!
ORIGINAL: omer333
4.5 litre, that would be maybe a 270 cubic inch engine right?
Oh how I miss cubic inches instead of litres!
Seriously. I grew up hearing 305, 302, 350, 351, 400, 427, 454, 440, etc. Now it's 2.0, 2.3, 5.0, 5.7, 4.0, 4.6, 3.5, etc. I feel like I'm not even talking about an engine anymore. Could we please go back to cubic inches!?!?!?!
That was a rant at the world, not at any of you.
ORIGINAL: fazm
just fyi, the 4.5 stroker with a forged rotating assembly would be 8K+ from them, i already asked lol
just fyi, the 4.5 stroker with a forged rotating assembly would be 8K+ from them, i already asked lol
Oh how I miss cubic inches instead of litres!
Seriously. I grew up hearing 305, 302, 350, 351, 400, 427, 454, 440, etc. Now it's 2.0, 2.3, 5.0, 5.7, 4.0, 4.6, 3.5, etc. I feel like I'm not even talking about an engine anymore. Could we please go back to cubic inches!?!?!?!
That was a rant at the world, not at any of you.
At least we're not in the import world and have a 1.8L... it sounds like someone already drank some of our bottle of coke!
Actually, I blame it all on Vanilla Ice.
#24
RE: Cams and Heads
ORIGINAL: omer333
No coke over here. Just been thinking that way since 1992. Darn 5.0 Mustangs, "Does it have a 5.0? What? A 5.0, does it have a 5.0? What's a 5.0? Oh, it's a 302, why didn't you just say '302'?"
Actually, I blame it all on Vanilla Ice.
ORIGINAL: hamidlmt
Amen to that!
At least we're not in the import world and have a 1.8L... it sounds like someone already drank some of our bottle of coke!
ORIGINAL: omer333
4.5 litre, that would be maybe a 270 cubic inch engine right?
Oh how I miss cubic inches instead of litres!
Seriously. I grew up hearing 305, 302, 350, 351, 400, 427, 454, 440, etc. Now it's 2.0, 2.3, 5.0, 5.7, 4.0, 4.6, 3.5, etc. I feel like I'm not even talking about an engine anymore. Could we please go back to cubic inches!?!?!?!
That was a rant at the world, not at any of you.
ORIGINAL: fazm
just fyi, the 4.5 stroker with a forged rotating assembly would be 8K+ from them, i already asked lol
just fyi, the 4.5 stroker with a forged rotating assembly would be 8K+ from them, i already asked lol
Oh how I miss cubic inches instead of litres!
Seriously. I grew up hearing 305, 302, 350, 351, 400, 427, 454, 440, etc. Now it's 2.0, 2.3, 5.0, 5.7, 4.0, 4.6, 3.5, etc. I feel like I'm not even talking about an engine anymore. Could we please go back to cubic inches!?!?!?!
That was a rant at the world, not at any of you.
At least we're not in the import world and have a 1.8L... it sounds like someone already drank some of our bottle of coke!
Actually, I blame it all on Vanilla Ice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post