18"s VS 17"s VS 16"s
#12
I went from a 215/65 series 16" to a 235/55 series 17" to a 255/45 series 18".
I am selling the 16s and 17s.
More tread to the ground width wise and the same rolling diameter but with
less sidewall height for better feel of the road.
Yes, more rolling and sprung weight but the better handling
is an excellent trade-off. I dont notice any difference in take-off\
and such. My 1/4 times have improved from the increased traction during launch.
Its 275/40-18s next time and still keeping the OEM rolling diameter but
60mm wider than the 16s and 40mm wider than the 17s.
I am selling the 16s and 17s.
More tread to the ground width wise and the same rolling diameter but with
less sidewall height for better feel of the road.
Yes, more rolling and sprung weight but the better handling
is an excellent trade-off. I dont notice any difference in take-off\
and such. My 1/4 times have improved from the increased traction during launch.
Its 275/40-18s next time and still keeping the OEM rolling diameter but
60mm wider than the 16s and 40mm wider than the 17s.
Last edited by 157dB; 03-24-2009 at 04:20 PM.
#13
Since I ordered the Pony Package, mine came with 17" rims. As far as gas mileage, I just checked two days ago when I filled up and got 22.5 mpg in the city.
I think the posters above are correct in saying anything bigger you need more hp to compensate for the added weight.
I think the posters above are correct in saying anything bigger you need more hp to compensate for the added weight.
#14
i went from stock 16's to my DD 18's with very little ride comfort decrease. My MPG has stayed the same. and the new look is undeniably better. new setup is 18x9 front with a 255/40R18 and rear is a 18x10 285/40R18. I used BFG 's KDW2.
http://speedjunkies.org/garage/uploa...8394_thumb.jpg
http://speedjunkies.org/garage/uploa...8685_thumb.jpg
http://speedjunkies.org/garage/uploa...8394_thumb.jpg
http://speedjunkies.org/garage/uploa...8685_thumb.jpg
#16
This is where physics and practical application get fuzzy.
I put my wheels (17's to 18's) on AT the track (better tools) and had multiple runs both pre/post the install.
I will save the drama, but there was no difference. Runs varied by 1/8 second and were high/low on both ends.
I put my wheels (17's to 18's) on AT the track (better tools) and had multiple runs both pre/post the install.
I will save the drama, but there was no difference. Runs varied by 1/8 second and were high/low on both ends.
#17
look, all i know is i felt it myself. i'm not taking someone's word for it or making it up. i essentially drove two mustangs equally equipped....one with the fanblades and one with the seventeen inch stock bullits, and i'm telling you there IS a difference. someone called it a difference in rotational mass or something to that effect...
Typically mass & weight are simliar... but if you have a larger rim (18") that weighs less than a smaller rim (16") then rotational mass does not mean much. Weight has a far worse affect on accelaration than rotational mass does.
Now before the flames... typicall larger rims weigh more so this would not be a true statement, but if you have a lighter larger rim, you have more rotational mass, but less weight therefore you have quicker accerlation.
There is oddy's words of wisdom for today...