Smaller engine, more power?
how can a 3.5 be more powerful than the 4.0 we have in the same weight body?
http://www.muscularmustangs.com/2005...7newengine.php
http://www.muscularmustangs.com/2005...7newengine.php
the answer is in the article
"The upper end of this engine consists of DOHC (dual over head cam) aluminum cylinder heads which incorporate centrally located spark plugs, and combustion chambers resulting in a 10.3:1 compression ratio. "The 3.5-liter V-6 uses a compact, lightweight dual-overhead cam valvetrain for peak power capability and smooth operation at high RPMs. The engine also incorporates intake variable cam timing (iVCT) to optimize valve timing for a smooth idle, optimal part-load driving and an impressively broad torque curve with good power. The iVCT system uses a hydraulically actuated spool valve that can rotate the intake camshafts up to 40 degrees within a half-second."
Valvetrain DAMB, 4 valves per cylinder, intake variable camshaft timing
Longer stroke, Higher Compression, more valves and Variable Valve Timing. The smaller bore cancels out the increase in TQ you would normally see when increasing the stroke on a similar engine.
"The upper end of this engine consists of DOHC (dual over head cam) aluminum cylinder heads which incorporate centrally located spark plugs, and combustion chambers resulting in a 10.3:1 compression ratio. "The 3.5-liter V-6 uses a compact, lightweight dual-overhead cam valvetrain for peak power capability and smooth operation at high RPMs. The engine also incorporates intake variable cam timing (iVCT) to optimize valve timing for a smooth idle, optimal part-load driving and an impressively broad torque curve with good power. The iVCT system uses a hydraulically actuated spool valve that can rotate the intake camshafts up to 40 degrees within a half-second."
Valvetrain DAMB, 4 valves per cylinder, intake variable camshaft timing
Longer stroke, Higher Compression, more valves and Variable Valve Timing. The smaller bore cancels out the increase in TQ you would normally see when increasing the stroke on a similar engine.
well why dont they apply the same components and principles into the 4.0 and get even more power? it just dosent make sence why they'd switch to a smaller engine like they did with the 5.0's
ORIGINAL: LesteR723
well why dont they apply the same components and principles into the 4.0 and get even more power? it just dosent make sence why they'd switch to a smaller engine like they did with the 5.0's
well why dont they apply the same components and principles into the 4.0 and get even more power? it just dosent make sence why they'd switch to a smaller engine like they did with the 5.0's
Same can be said for Nissan/Infinity heavy use of their existing 3.5L motor. They could've engineered a new engine for the 350Z (that output 350hp) but then it would bump it to 40K or more or make infinity cost another 5-10k.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShaneB26154
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
35
Mar 4, 2021 04:05 AM
cardsrus1
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Sep 15, 2015 08:37 AM
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
Sep 5, 2015 07:01 PM
Soldier GT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
9
Aug 12, 2015 03:46 PM



