2005-2009 S197 Appearance Section For all appearance mods to the 2005-2009 S197's

20" rims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #21  
Chris07GT's Avatar
Chris07GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,181
From: Tampa, FL
Default

I just went from the stock 18's to the 20" CS69's. 255/35/20 Nitto front, 285/30/20 Nitto Rear. Love them so far
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 08:35 PM
  #22  
2007grabberGt's Avatar
2007grabberGt
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 116
From: Michigan
Default

I love my 20's They ride and look great. If you feel need the speed you just put on you race rims and M/T's
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #23  
Poco's Avatar
Poco
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,056
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by GM EATER
I'll go with your daughter rotational mass works! 20's Rock!
I'm saving up for a set of these 7 spoke 2281 Saleen series in black for my Grabber.
http://cruizinconcepts.com/saleen_mu...ica_wheels.asp
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #24  
2007grabberGt's Avatar
2007grabberGt
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 116
From: Michigan
Default

Sweet!!
Old Jun 19, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #25  
2007grabberGt's Avatar
2007grabberGt
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 116
From: Michigan
Default

by the way. Mine are as light as all the others. I just had to pay 3 times as much
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 12:01 AM
  #26  
Barricade643's Avatar
Barricade643
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 136
From: Cybertron
Default

So I was told
Nitto NT555 Extreme Performance in the the following sizes:

Front - 255/35-20
Rear - 285/30-20
255/35-20 $126 x2 = $252
285/30-20 $259 x2 = $518

So $770....uuugh.....


Is that about right?
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 03:14 AM
  #27  
Starfire's Avatar
Starfire
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 775
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by tim.route
Are you an idiot? I meant that the tires were the SAME width and height. Never said anything about aspect ratios and such. I mean measure the tire you put on your 20" with a tape measure and then find a 16" or 17" tire that is the same. You would have the same circumference and width but with more side wall.
Ah and we resort to name calling, well I'm done with this thread because arguing over the internet is like winning the special olympics. Plus buy what you like and be happy.
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 03:49 AM
  #28  
wilkinda's Avatar
wilkinda
2010 Section Moderator
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,328
From: Lithia, FL
Default

Originally Posted by tim.route
Are you an idiot? I meant that the tires were the SAME width and height. Never said anything about aspect ratios and such. I mean measure the tire you put on your 20" with a tape measure and then find a 16" or 17" tire that is the same. You would have the same circumference and width but with more side wall.
Wow..someone always has to resort to name calling. Can't just have an intellectual debate or difference of opinion without some one always resorting to starting name calling and it looks like the instigator is you ...... What an idiot!!!
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #29  
Chris07GT's Avatar
Chris07GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,181
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Lampoon, yeah, that's about right. Nobody said 20's were cheap!
Old Jun 20, 2009 | 09:14 AM
  #30  
whitestang07's Avatar
whitestang07
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 380
Default

I just took off my 20's and am very happy I will never put another 20 on my car they looked good but sucked *** overall mine weiged in at 70 pounds a piece



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.