2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Intake/Tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 03:59 AM
  #1  
GT_Stang's Avatar
GT_Stang
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 726
From:
Default Intake/Tune

will i feel a difference with an intake and tune? does it really make a difference? does anyone have a intake/tune?
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 04:11 AM
  #2  
brendend's Avatar
brendend
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,473
From:
Default RE: Intake/Tune

yes you well feel a difference, a huge one. i think everyone here has a intake/tune and youll hear alot of different names for a tuner. i went with brenspeed and im loving it.
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #3  
doode's Avatar
doode
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 639
From: British Columbia
Default RE: Intake/Tune

when i 1st installed it it was day and night
running 87 octane, not a huge increase in power, but throttle response is 1,000,000 times better

the gains in power, ive gotten used to it and now it seems a little too tame
gotta drain the tank of 87 and run 94
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 05:03 AM
  #4  
Leos06gtLL's Avatar
Leos06gtLL
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 978
From: SO CAL
Default RE: Intake/Tune

its worth the money make sure you get an intake with a bigger mass flow meter like, c&l,JLT,demotlet etc
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 10:03 AM
  #5  
partsbill's Avatar
partsbill
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 853
From: Lake Worth, FL.
Default RE: Intake/Tune

you'll definitely feel a difference, it's definitely worth the money, and the majority of people on this forum have a intake/tuner
I went with a JLT/B A M A setup.
[IMG][/image
Old Jun 16, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #6  
AWESOMO 4000's Avatar
AWESOMO 4000
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 64
Default RE: Intake/Tune

I went JLT and Bmachips as well. On the same night, the 93 octane torq and performance tunes (you get 3 to choose from...performance, torque, and race) were .25 quicker than the 87 octane performance tune. Had I tested them on the same night, I feel that the performance tune would have been .20 quicker than stock.

The stock throttle lag is awful. They actually DID clean it up a LITTLE bit on the 2007s, but it's still not like a real throttle with a cable set up. The performance tuners (particularly Doug wtih Bmachips) get the throttle so it responds. You can actually downshift now, blipping the throttle, not holding it for a second waiting for something to happen.

The computer on stick cars pulls 15 degrees of timing out of it between shifts. That's horrible. It also slowly begins to close the throttle and retard time against your will as you approach redline. The tuner also bumps the rev limiter a few hundred RPM, so you can take advantage of the extra power and power curve of the tuner out to 6500rpm. There is a little work done with the variable cam timing, but not a whole lot.

One thing you will also enjoy, is improved fuel economy. My MPG improved by 2mpg after installing Doug's 93 Performance tune. Yes I have to use premium and pay more for it (oh no, $2.00 a tankful...), but the fuel economy pays for it, and I'm making 35hp more than I was stock.

The top CAI kits all perform about the same. C&L, Steeda, and JLT are the most popular. If you're going to stay stock, stick with the smaller MAF housing. Anything over 90mm is overkill and won't yield you anything, unless you're planning on exetensive induction mods in the future.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bolivianpimp
Street/Strip
7
May 16, 2009 05:54 PM
Unleashedbeast
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
Feb 25, 2008 07:07 AM
rap87
2005-2014 Mustangs
2
Jan 5, 2008 12:21 PM
1BAD3V
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
Jun 1, 2007 07:33 PM
stangmann
2005-2014 Mustangs
8
Jun 17, 2006 04:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.