2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #31  
Bluestar's Avatar
Bluestar
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,997
From:
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

I've been using Hurst Shifters for years, always liked them. I think you can see one of them in this Corvette I was restoring a few years back. Dollar for dollar and pound for pound, I think it's a Great buy.
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 12:28 AM
  #32  
danGT06's Avatar
danGT06
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 732
From: Tucson Arizona
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

I have the hurst and I powershift all the time at the track and haven't missed a gear yet. *knock on wood* The hurst just snaps into second and its literally impossible to miss third when powershifting with it. Thats just my personal experience with the hurst I haven't used any other aftermarket shifter.
ORIGINAL: DarkFireGT

ORIGINAL: acstone7

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
I believe this all comes down to if you are wanting to powershift or not. If you do want to powershift, I reccomend staying away from the hurst and getting the MGW, solved my problem. If powershifting isnt an issue then I would go hurst, i loved the look and feel of it, just couldnt get over how it wouldnt PS for the life of me.
Hurst seems to powershift fine for me. Grip it and rip it!
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 05:13 AM
  #33  
Caution's Avatar
Caution
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,132
From: California
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Hurst -- love it
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 05:41 AM
  #34  
Ortoch's Avatar
Ortoch
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,019
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: danGT06

I have the hurst and I powershift all the time at the track and haven't missed a gear yet. *knock on wood* The hurst just snaps into second and its literally impossible to miss third when powershifting with it. Thats just my personal experience with the hurst I haven't used any other aftermarket shifter.
ORIGINAL: DarkFireGT

ORIGINAL: acstone7

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
I believe this all comes down to if you are wanting to powershift or not. If you do want to powershift, I reccomend staying away from the hurst and getting the MGW, solved my problem. If powershifting isnt an issue then I would go hurst, i loved the look and feel of it, just couldnt get over how it wouldnt PS for the life of me.
Hurst seems to powershift fine for me. Grip it and rip it!
+1 definatly love my hurst

Question though how do you powershift? Basically its just keepin the gas on the floor, no clutch, and shift through the resistance? Isnt that bad for your clutch?
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 07:41 AM
  #35  
lieu910's Avatar
lieu910
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 556
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
When you say perfroms better, bare in mind that maydepend on how the car is being used.

I have a Hurst, andI love the looks, and the shifting action is fine for now. For a street car, the Hurst may be just fine for you;however, for more of a racing application, I would personally give the MGW a nod over the Hurst.
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #36  
06Redfire3V's Avatar
06Redfire3V
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,498
From: Oklahoma
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

all depends on what feel you like? personally i like the hurst
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #37  
Pwny's Avatar
Pwny
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,248
From:
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Its all cost to benefit my friends. I would say Hurst.
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #38  
Margarita Girl's Avatar
Margarita Girl
Is the tide gonna reach my chair?
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,389
From: Nor'east
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

I'll make it 9 in a row. Hurst.
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #39  
Juban's Avatar
Juban
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 126
From: Louisiana
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

lots of great info to keep in mind. I'll eventually post back up with what i decide (may get one sooner than than later, dunno)

Thanks!
Old May 15, 2008 | 01:52 AM
  #40  
rubah_dmb's Avatar
rubah_dmb
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 27
From: Texas
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

just got my Comp. Plus...absolutely LOVE it!!!! Smooth shifts are for sissies!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.