17" Stocker Bullits

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-22-2008, 11:26 AM

banka87

4th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: Md

Posts: 1,132

17" Stocker Bullits

Anyone know what the Revs per mile on these are?

I just picked up a set off a friend with the stock pirrellis still on them.

01-22-2008, 11:40 AM

Black_06GTStang

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Ontario, Canada

Posts: 195

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

They are 742 revs per mile if memory serves.

01-22-2008, 11:45 AM

MustangGT0405

5th Gear Member

Join Date: Jun 2007

Location: Orlando, FL

Posts: 2,276

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

742 revs per mile with a 235/55/17 tire

01-22-2008, 11:46 AM

MustangGT0405

5th Gear Member

Join Date: Jun 2007

Location: Orlando, FL

Posts: 2,276

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

sorry got beat, thats what I get for answering the phone

01-22-2008, 12:10 PM

157dB

Cut & Paste Expert

Join Date: May 2007

Location: NW Arkansas

Posts: 13,322

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

742 RPMile

01-22-2008, 01:05 PM

rls82959

3rd Gear Member

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: Colorado

Posts: 944

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

Hopefully you're taking the Pirellis off of them.
If not, check them for flat spots first.
The best balance in the world nor time can fix a POS pirelli with flat spots.

01-22-2008, 01:11 PM

RED121572

4th Gear Member

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Ohioland, Ohio

Posts: 1,324

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

http://www.gordon-glasgow.org/tirecalc.html

01-22-2008, 01:16 PM

banka87

4th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: Md

Posts: 1,132

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

Thanks guys...Now I know how fast I'm going haha

01-22-2008, 05:09 PM

UrS4

4th Gear Member

Join Date: Mar 2006

Location: CA

Posts: 1,313

RE: 17" Stocker Bullits

Tirerack.com has the stock Piellis at 768 revs per mile.

Bigcustomwheels.com says 742 with a 27.2 inch diameter.

And if math serves me correctly 63360 inches in a mile, 27.2 inch diameter = 85.54 inches per rev, so the answer is pretty close to 742.

Conclusion, tirerack.com is wrong.