2010 Revealed
6th Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Some things I like, some things not. And one or two things "not sure".
Likes:
Rear quarters (maintains some heritage), dash (I do hope that a 6-gauge cluster remains an option).
Claimed ability to completely turn off both traction and stability control.
Dislikes:
Rear (too big, too "heavy", and way too busy - the little downward "point" under the inner clear portions of the taillight assemblies is without purpose or consistency with any other body line and is just plain wrong)
Wheels/tires that are even bigger than those on the current car (which at 27" tall overall are already an inch bigger than really necessary IMHO). It's not the side view that needs to have the eye distracted from a styling flaw by wheels that overpower it, and they don't help the rear view (that could stand a little help in that department).
Not sure:
Front spoiler as shown in post #166 above. Looks late 60-ish, but somehow not quite right.
ON EDIT - Was that a red 2010 convertible on a turntable right at the very end of last night's episode of "Knight Rider"? They kept cutting to it and then away from it before I could identify it for sure. If so, a little more teasing on Ford's part?
Norm
Likes:
Rear quarters (maintains some heritage), dash (I do hope that a 6-gauge cluster remains an option).
Claimed ability to completely turn off both traction and stability control.
Dislikes:
Rear (too big, too "heavy", and way too busy - the little downward "point" under the inner clear portions of the taillight assemblies is without purpose or consistency with any other body line and is just plain wrong)
Wheels/tires that are even bigger than those on the current car (which at 27" tall overall are already an inch bigger than really necessary IMHO). It's not the side view that needs to have the eye distracted from a styling flaw by wheels that overpower it, and they don't help the rear view (that could stand a little help in that department).
Not sure:
Front spoiler as shown in post #166 above. Looks late 60-ish, but somehow not quite right.
ON EDIT - Was that a red 2010 convertible on a turntable right at the very end of last night's episode of "Knight Rider"? They kept cutting to it and then away from it before I could identify it for sure. If so, a little more teasing on Ford's part?
Norm
Last edited by Norm Peterson; Nov 23, 2008 at 08:35 AM.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 769
From:
OMG!!!! what the hell they did to the Mustang!!! I'm so jealous of the extra 15HP and don't get me started with the interiors....LOLOL....
J/K couldn't resist!!!
The taillights are a bit to euro for my taste but will reserve final judgement until I see one in person...
J/K couldn't resist!!!
The taillights are a bit to euro for my taste but will reserve final judgement until I see one in person...
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 505
From: Orange county, CA
Some things I like, some things not. And one or two things "not sure".
Likes:
Rear quarters (maintains some heritage), dash (I do hope that a 6-gauge cluster remains an option).
Claimed ability to completely turn off both traction and stability control.
Dislikes:
Rear (too big, too "heavy", and way too busy - the little downward "point" under the inner clear portions of the taillight assemblies is without purpose or consistency with any other body line and is just plain wrong)
Wheels/tires that are even bigger than those on the current car (which at 27" tall overall are already an inch bigger than really necessary IMHO). It's not the side view that needs to have the eye distracted from a styling flaw by wheels that overpower it, and they don't help the rear view (that could stand a little help in that department).
Not sure:
Front spoiler as shown in post #166 above. Looks late 60-ish, but somehow not quite right.
ON EDIT - Was that a red 2010 convertible on a turntable right at the very end of last night's episode of "Knight Rider"? They kept cutting to it and then away from it before I could identify it for sure. If so, a little more teasing on Ford's part?
Norm
Likes:
Rear quarters (maintains some heritage), dash (I do hope that a 6-gauge cluster remains an option).
Claimed ability to completely turn off both traction and stability control.
Dislikes:
Rear (too big, too "heavy", and way too busy - the little downward "point" under the inner clear portions of the taillight assemblies is without purpose or consistency with any other body line and is just plain wrong)
Wheels/tires that are even bigger than those on the current car (which at 27" tall overall are already an inch bigger than really necessary IMHO). It's not the side view that needs to have the eye distracted from a styling flaw by wheels that overpower it, and they don't help the rear view (that could stand a little help in that department).
Not sure:
Front spoiler as shown in post #166 above. Looks late 60-ish, but somehow not quite right.
ON EDIT - Was that a red 2010 convertible on a turntable right at the very end of last night's episode of "Knight Rider"? They kept cutting to it and then away from it before I could identify it for sure. If so, a little more teasing on Ford's part?
Norm
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 232
From: South Carolina
OMG...................NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! What the hell are they thinking up there in Michigan?? What is fords problem, always doing stupid crap. The list hits the floor with stupid ignorant stuff that they put out. Im a die hard ford guy but cmon.... I dont understand, yeah it looks cool but im tired of getting wooped up on by ricers and NOW A V6 CHEVY???? Im about given up on good old ford.... We shouldnt have to empty our pockets, void the warranties, and tear our engines apart to be able to compete with ricers and other cars. o well, the G35 coupes look good...........
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 170
From: CA
i was gonna reserve my final judgment until i saw it in person
just got back from the la show...
i am extremely disappointed. i was gonna get one this summer if i liked it. now, im just gonna try to get a new 09.
just got back from the la show...
i am extremely disappointed. i was gonna get one this summer if i liked it. now, im just gonna try to get a new 09.
4th Gear Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,039
From: OC, California
It's nothing groundbreaking. Refresh? Yes. Better? I don't think so. It's just a different. I'm pretty discouraged with no new power options. And I don't like the rear... the taillights are ugly and that black area in the rear valance is too big. I'm going to the LA Auto Show on Thursday so I'll reserve full judgement until then, but I kinda already knew what to expect from all those spy shots.
