2005 gt vs 2000 s4
#12
RE: 2005 gt vs 2000 s4
ORIGINAL: JML
No way an S4 tt + bolt ons can make less than 13 secs. I beat one with chip and exhaust with my old car... We were in low 14´s (6600 ft above sea level)... It´s a heavy car.
No way an S4 tt + bolt ons can make less than 13 secs. I beat one with chip and exhaust with my old car... We were in low 14´s (6600 ft above sea level)... It´s a heavy car.
#14
RE: 2005 gt vs 2000 s4
The S4 with twin turbos was fast as hell, especially with a chip and bolt ons. My buddy has one that puts out nearly 400 hp and over 400 ft/lbs torque. But the newer model with the massive V8 is even better, puts out 340 hp stock. No turbos so the tunning doesn't get you as much, but that thing is a beast. The car is the same size as the A4 (I drive a 2002 1.8T A4 as well as the mustang) but with a 4.2 V8 in there. As someone said though, Audi's are supposed to be great German machines, but are actually full of issues. My first audi was a lemon that i got exchanged, and my current one has small problems left and right, nothing major, just a pain in the rear. Not to mention that service sucks the huge one.
Despite those shortcomings S4's are the real deal stock and with a few mods are real beasts. The thing I dislike is that they look way too much like an A4 and nobody knows that the plain looking 4 Door has a monster lurking.
Despite those shortcomings S4's are the real deal stock and with a few mods are real beasts. The thing I dislike is that they look way too much like an A4 and nobody knows that the plain looking 4 Door has a monster lurking.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trashxtrash
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
09-20-2015 10:49 PM