351 Mustang

Fuel Injected 393 stroker or Carb?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2009, 11:18 PM
  #1  
347FordNY
Thread Starter
 
347FordNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 8
Default Fuel Injected 393 stroker or Carb?

I recently purchased an 88 Fox Gt and was debating whether to go way of carb or Fuel injection for a 393 stroker. I am getting ready to purchase a 351W block and a new pair of Trickflow R series heads for relatively cheap. I have a donor 351W from a 90 F-250 to switch all the wiring over and a 5.0 from a mustang if needed. Anyone have any suggestions?
347FordNY is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 03:22 PM
  #2  
wildcobrar
3rd Gear Member
 
wildcobrar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 577
Default

Carb is easier to do. Easier to set up and less money to boot.


Joe
wildcobrar is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 05:26 PM
  #3  
347FordNY
Thread Starter
 
347FordNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 8
Default

Yeh that's what I was leaning towards. I have never had a carb engine but I have just recently finished building a Injected 347 and it was a bit pricey. Thanks
347FordNY is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
Sixx
2005-2014 Mustangs
9
10-05-2015 07:36 PM
svfetter
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
9
10-05-2015 11:39 AM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 01:02 AM
mrappe
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
0
09-26-2015 10:16 AM



Quick Reply: Fuel Injected 393 stroker or Carb?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.