4.0L V6 Technical Discussions Any questions about engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

Technical question about Tuner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #1  
baspears's Avatar
baspears
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46
From:
Default Technical question about Tuner?

So today I went for a ride with a guy who just got his SCT X-Cal 2 tuner and tuned it with the 93 octane? (Don't know much about tunes) Anyway, I was AMAZED! I cannot believe the difference. My question is that I have the MMR CAI, which I understand is not tunable (but it does look good). He has the K&N which he says is technically not tunable. Am I going to see the amount of performance increase as his car has?

[IMG]local://upfiles/39526/17373493DFBC434C826E4ABE0761F2D5.jpg[/IMG]
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
Lizzy's Avatar
Lizzy
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 79
From:
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?

Well not tunable is a matter of opinion.

From what I have read there are three kinds of CAI's

a) Not tunable .... don't change air flow at all.... worthless.

b) Not tunable .... Leans your car AF mixture and gives the impression of better fuel economy (by running lean enough to avoid a CEL warning, but still lean).

c) Tunable .....Substantial air flow increase and requieres a tune to avoid CEL (best choice) CEL warning typically occurrs when the "Math" used by the MAF and Table can not come up with a suitable AF mixture and thinks the world is gone mad....

If I am wrong please correct me guys......
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
05BlackPony's Avatar
05BlackPony
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 667
From: Florida
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?


ORIGINAL: Lizzy

Well not tunable is a matter of opinion.

From what I have read there are three kinds of CAI's

a) Not tunable .... don't change air flow at all.... worthless.

b) Not tunable .... Leans your car AF mixture and gives the impression of better fuel economy (by running lean enough to avoid a CEL warning, but still lean).

c) Tunable .....Substantial air flow increase and requieres a tune to avoid CEL (best choice) CEL warning typically occurrs when the "Math" used by the MAF and Table can not come up with a suitable AF mixture and thinks the world is gone mad....

If I am wrong please correct me guys......
Thats pretty spot on [sm=smiley20.gif]

Old Jul 26, 2006 | 06:54 PM
  #4  
baspears's Avatar
baspears
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46
From:
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?

I know my MMR did not require a tune, now when I bought it they advertised ( and still do) that the entire package that I purchased would increase my horsepower by 35, I certainly don't think it did that, but I did notice a little gain. I am getting duals if they ever get here, and I feel like I should notice a little more gain from the MMR because of th GT take offs being less restrictive. ??Does that sound right?
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #5  
pat6674u's Avatar
pat6674u
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 855
From: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?

The claim sounds right, whether those claims are substantiated by a dyno run or not, I don't know. You'll be hard-pressed to find a bolt-on CAI that will give you 35+ hp.
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #6  
BlueStang6's Avatar
BlueStang6
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 247
From:
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?


ORIGINAL: pat6674u

The claim sounds right, whether those claims are substantiated by a dyno run or not, I don't know. You'll be hard-pressed to find a bolt-on CAI that will give you 35+ hp.
And don't forget, too, that depending on who wrote the tune program you use, you may or may not have as aggressive a tune as your buddy, even though you may be running the same octane.

Old Jul 26, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #7  
baspears's Avatar
baspears
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46
From:
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?

He Got his from Brenspeed, and said those guys were super cool. I could not believe when he stomped on the freakin gas from a complete stop, he laid rumber a long way, and actually said he could have gone a little more. My car will not do that now! He has an auto like mine, except mine is 06. I was very impressed and will be purchasing the X-Cal in the very near future. Thanks for everyone's posts.
Old Jul 27, 2006 | 03:24 AM
  #8  
LX200's Avatar
LX200
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,268
From:
Default RE: Technical question about Tuner?


ORIGINAL: pat6674u

The claim sounds right, whether those claims are substantiated by a dyno run or not, I don't know. You'll be hard-pressed to find a bolt-on CAI that will give you 35+ hp.
It gets a little fuzzy when talking about RWHP and flywheel HP. If the CAI and tune yield 25 RWHP, that would be the same as 30-32 HP at the flywheel. So, if you want to know how much higher a HP you should quote when comparing to flywheel HP for other cars, it would seem adding 30 HP for tune, CAI and muffler is about right. That puts our V6's at a very respectable 240 HP and 250+ torque, flywheel.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
Oct 22, 2015 11:55 PM
04stangman
2005-2014 Mustangs
4
Sep 17, 2015 01:45 PM
nboost
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
Sep 16, 2015 05:35 AM
Daddys Girls GTs
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Sep 14, 2015 08:46 PM
ernesto-619
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
Sep 10, 2015 01:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 AM.