4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

flowmaster 10 vs 40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2007, 03:02 AM
  #1  
jt01gt
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
jt01gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 294
Default flowmaster 10 vs 40

I dont think I ever heard 10's and was just wondering if they sound like 40's but just louder
[align=left] [/align]
jt01gt is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 04:03 AM
  #2  
freeunit
2nd Gear Member
 
freeunit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 457
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

never heard of 10's
freeunit is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 04:27 AM
  #3  
jt01gt
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
jt01gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 294
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

Yeah 10 series flowmasters
[align=left] [/align]
jt01gt is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 04:41 AM
  #4  
97targa
5th Gear Member
 
97targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,625
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

Yeah there's a sound clip on this forums with a 4.6L GT. 40's sound like Rice Cakes and the 10's sound way worse. They sound like there's no mufflers with tons of baffling goin on. Real sloppy soundin! I have had many props for my Magnapacks which are really deep and clean. I have only had my car out 4 times and props everytime it's been out! Borla's and Magnaflow are the only way to go. If you have 40 series, toss them like I did. I will never own, let me repeat...I will NEVER own Flowmasters ever again after hearing my Magnapacks set-up. I fell in love!
97targa is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 05:03 AM
  #5  
jt01gt
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
jt01gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 294
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

I planning on getting a new cat back, But yes im going to ask cause im too lazy to look 4 myself -- how much for the Borla cat back
[align=left] [/align]
jt01gt is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 12:44 PM
  #6  
blownbayou
3rd Gear Member
 
blownbayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 633
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

Got 10s on my Lightning and it is THE BEST SOUNDING FLOWMASTER SETUP ON A LIGHTNING to date.......I have One Chamber IMCOs on my Stang and they sound GREAT!!!!!

Later
blownbayou is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 01:48 PM
  #7  
2002GTAUTOVERT
5th Gear Member
 
2002GTAUTOVERT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 2,441
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

ORIGINAL: 97targa

Yeah there's a sound clip on this forums with a 4.6L GT. 40's sound like Rice Cakes and the 10's sound way worse. They sound like there's no mufflers with tons of baffling goin on. Real sloppy soundin! I have had many props for my Magnapacks which are really deep and clean. I have only had my car out 4 times and props everytime it's been out! Borla's and Magnaflow are the only way to go. If you have 40 series, toss them like I did. I will never own, let me repeat...I will NEVER own Flowmasters ever again after hearing my Magnapacks set-up. I fell in love!
you heard a sound clip of the 10's? i know for a fact 95 percent of sound clips are from cell phones (i admit i have done it) and no wonder you think the 10's sound like sh*t. im running 10's on mine and they arent nearly as loud as lm1's or 2's. the 10's dont even begin to get too loud until you hit 3 rpms, other than that its the deep muscle car rumble. dont comment on how bad the 10's are unless youve actually had a 1st person experience with them, however the 40's i do believe are garbage on mustangs. on top of getting the 10's try running it with 2.75 inch piping and a catted h-pipe. i dont get comments on my exhaust, just comments on whatbuilt engine im running because they hear the exhaust (and assume the 4.6 isnt capable of the rumble it gives off). enough said.
2002GTAUTOVERT is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:14 PM
  #8  
roush17
3rd Gear Member
 
roush17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 757
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

I've got one chambers (10 series) on mine and love the sound! It isn't the typical Flow sound but very deep and sounds amazing at WOT.
roush17 is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:18 PM
  #9  
bjh061487
3rd Gear Member
 
bjh061487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 965
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

ORIGINAL: 97targa

Yeah there's a sound clip on this forums with a 4.6L GT. 40's sound like Rice Cakes and the 10's sound way worse. They sound like there's no mufflers with tons of baffling goin on. Real sloppy soundin! I have had many props for my Magnapacks which are really deep and clean. I have only had my car out 4 times and props everytime it's been out! Borla's and Magnaflow are the only way to go. If you have 40 series, toss them like I did. I will never own, let me repeat...I will NEVER own Flowmasters ever again after hearing my Magnapacks set-up. I fell in love!
Borla makes an exhaust system for the mustang? i couldn't find it on their website
bjh061487 is offline  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:42 PM
  #10  
Black_GT_02
4th Gear Member
 
Black_GT_02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: TN
Posts: 1,045
Default RE: flowmaster 10 vs 40

i'd go with 40's....pure sex

borla exhaust on a mustang is great also...its really deep

some guys like to hear the cams better so they switch from borla to slp or something along those lines though
Black_GT_02 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vrooom
4.6L General Discussion
13
02-21-2016 05:25 PM
1996cobraconvertible
SVT Forums
13
01-07-2016 04:50 AM
SSG Steggy
3.7L V6 Technical Discussions
2
11-05-2015 03:09 PM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM
Webster454
2005-2014 Mustangs
1
09-07-2015 04:59 AM



Quick Reply: flowmaster 10 vs 40



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.