Making hood scoop functional?
#11
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
yeah i was going to say. i owned one and sold it. some people actually put spacers onthe top of therek-member to lower it down 2 inches to clear. they do it with the intake i own. Then they idk cut the springs, use lowering springs, or they have adjustables idk what they do.
#12
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
ORIGINAL: redstanger
yeah i was going to say. i owned one and sold it. some people actually put spacers onthe top of therek-member to lower it down 2 inches to clear. they do it with the intake i own. Then they idk cut the springs, use lowering springs, or they have adjustables idk what they do.
yeah i was going to say. i owned one and sold it. some people actually put spacers onthe top of therek-member to lower it down 2 inches to clear. they do it with the intake i own. Then they idk cut the springs, use lowering springs, or they have adjustables idk what they do.
#13
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
yeah i got my hood when i got the kenne bell. then when i was in the market for a intake manifold for my turbo setup. Logan was the only one that i could use my hood for.
#14
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
#15
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
ORIGINAL: jmac72187
It is possible but there will be no gains. The only thing you can do it tell people that your scoop is real.
It is possible but there will be no gains. The only thing you can do it tell people that your scoop is real.
#16
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
ORIGINAL: StriderTacticaL
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
Slightly more cooler & turbulant air with no place to go. A mach1 hood is no better than a fenderwell CAI.
#17
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
ORIGINAL: sxynerd
Bingo!
Slightly more cooler & turbulant air with no place to go. A mach1 hood is no better than a fenderwell CAI.
ORIGINAL: StriderTacticaL
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
Slightly more cooler & turbulant air with no place to go. A mach1 hood is no better than a fenderwell CAI.
#18
RE: Making hood scoop functional?
ORIGINAL: steve0914
actually your wrong.... it does provide some entertainment because you can watch your engine vibrate....
ORIGINAL: sxynerd
Bingo!
Slightly more cooler & turbulant air with no place to go. A mach1 hood is no better than a fenderwell CAI.
ORIGINAL: StriderTacticaL
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
So I don't really get why there would be NO gains even if it works just like the mach 1 's do. Unles you are telling me that the real mach 1 scoop is useless as well?
Slightly more cooler & turbulant air with no place to go. A mach1 hood is no better than a fenderwell CAI.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post