4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

h&r ss or 4cyl springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2009, 11:19 PM
  #1  
stang04chris
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
stang04chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tx
Posts: 329
Exclamation h&r ss or 4cyl springs

im am going to be getting springs within the month and have a problem. i really like the look of the h&r ss springs, but i wanna have a good launch. i wanna have good handling and still bust out of the hole, is this possible. also how much do i need to cut 4cyl in front and stock in back to have a sexy drop like h&r supersports.

i really want the best of both set ups i just dont think that is possible, any suggestions or advice is appreciated
stang04chris is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 01:38 AM
  #2  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Lowered to the level of H&R you are not gonna have great success with the 4 cyl front/stock back
I run 4cyl up front non-cut and C's in the back and that's decent
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:30 AM
  #3  
stang04chris
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
stang04chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tx
Posts: 329
Default

How much of a drop was that
stang04chris is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:33 AM
  #4  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by stang04chris
How much of a drop was that
Close to an inch
Few guys on here have cut 4cyl/C springs and have done well launch wise
Talk to Jay C, Zach99Gt, or 01GT4.6
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:39 AM
  #5  
k-rub
 
k-rub's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 10
Default

So what makes the H&R SS springs not good for launching? I was under the impression stiffer springs helped for a better launch.

Before I had the stang I owned an SRT4 and the stiffer springs, especially in the back, immensly helped out my launch.

So why would H&R be better for handling and the 4cyl or C springs be good for launching?
k-rub is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 12:32 PM
  #6  
loweredfourpointsix
2nd Gear Member
 
loweredfourpointsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: california
Posts: 380
Default

i know a soft spring in the front helps launching because it allows the front to rise easier with a rear wheel drive. makes sense that you would need stiffer springs in the rear with a front wheel drive so that the car doesnt squat in the rear thus keeping the weight over the front end.
loweredfourpointsix is offline  
Old 09-03-2009, 01:26 PM
  #7  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by k-rub
So what makes the H&R SS springs not good for launching?
A much higher spring weight in the back especially has very poor weight transfer
lizzyfan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
CS2007
General Tech
8
06-25-2019 09:45 PM
Gene K
S197 Handling Section
1
10-21-2015 11:37 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM



Quick Reply: h&r ss or 4cyl springs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.