4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

hello all!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #21  
defconfire's Avatar
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,791
From: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Default

I am still doubt full i think bhp is more realistic because if you take 10% drivetrain loss (I know thats low but I am guessing he went all out) and they are making 380 rwhp thats 422 fwhp.
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #22  
myslow2002gt's Avatar
myslow2002gt
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 578
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by SVTeeshirt
pics or it didnt happen, leave him be he's fighting for the fuel that makes your car go vroom, i mean freedom.. and stuff.
Ok, fine. It's never been done, that should suffice for everyones egos.
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #23  
defconfire's Avatar
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,791
From: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Default

Thanks, I feel better now.... LOL
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #24  
Stevecooper's Avatar
Stevecooper
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 912
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by SVTeeshirt
pics or it didnt happen, leave him be he's fighting for the fuel that makes your car go vroom, i mean freedom.. and stuff.


also, maybe it was another motor? he has built more than 1...
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #25  
myslow2002gt's Avatar
myslow2002gt
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 578
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by defconfire
I am still doubt full i think bhp is more realistic because if you take 10% drivetrain loss (I know thats low but I am guessing he went all out) and they are making 380 rwhp thats 422 fwhp.
It's understandable that you have doubts. He did infact post his dyno sheet on MD, but I'm searching through 31 pages at the moment to find it.

Anyways, another car has also done it and Logan Motorsports was involved with it.
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #26  
oxfordgt's Avatar
oxfordgt
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,448
From: Ohio
Default

Well all but actually dropping the pistons and rods in the holes and dropping in the crank I did on this engine. I gapped all the rings, I assembled the pistons and rods and when I picked the block up I checked all the clearences and torque specs before I took it home. So no I didn't assemble it but i did build it.
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #27  
defconfire's Avatar
defconfire
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,791
From: Cary/Charlotte, NC
Default

LOL.... This Poor OP it is his first post on these forums and he gets wrapped up in this huge argument.
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #28  
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,955
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Stevecooper
gtfo newb both ur posts are pointless try breaking the 20 post mark before u try to make fun of people

SLOW: and i was saying pics to the thread where he claimed he build his engine not that 400whp has been acheived.


btw slow u have a pm.
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #29  
steve0914's Avatar
steve0914
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,286
From: Georgia
Default

SVT stay out of this thread and let the big boys argue.. that pic was funny
Old Aug 30, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #30  
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,955
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by steve0914
SVT stay out of this thread and let the big boys argue.. that pic was funny
and who are u to tell me to stay out? u can gtfo too



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.