4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

catless!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:30 AM
  #11  
tbirdscwd's Avatar
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,039
From: CA
Default

If you don't mind the volume, then the only real downside is the legal aspect. I wouldn't run gutted cats just because an O/R pipe is so damn cheap. A full exhaust is more than enough backpressure without cats. Your car will perform better at every RPM without cats restricting the flow.
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:34 AM
  #12  
Z28KLR's Avatar
Z28KLR
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,826
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by RyanK
I just wanted to havee some fun, I mean I have a one day pass to be loud then its back to being slow and quiet): causee I hate getting stopped by the 5o
You must be running LM1's. If that's the case, try the 2's; pretty comparable in terms of loudness to 1's w/ stock midpipe (cats intact, of course). And regarding the "man", just don't drive like a dick and you should be o.k.
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:34 AM
  #13  
Mustang3GT07's Avatar
Mustang3GT07
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,169
From: Chicago, IL
Default

I love the smell of running no cats!
Old May 6, 2010 | 01:41 AM
  #14  
tbirdscwd's Avatar
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,039
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang3GT07
I love the smell of running no cats!
absolutely
Old May 6, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #15  
RyanK's Avatar
RyanK
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 308
From: TX
Default

it smells like a real car, and sounds like one too! just needs some more performance to back it all up!
Old May 6, 2010 | 11:28 AM
  #16  
stangalator's Avatar
stangalator
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,306
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang3GT07
I love the smell of running no cats!
^^this
Old May 6, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #17  
98redstang's Avatar
98redstang
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,312
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by SilverNGrey4.6s
^^ better
haha +1 My car screams when you get on it with the lts.
Old May 6, 2010 | 12:51 PM
  #18  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

Originally Posted by tbirdscwd
If you don't mind the volume, then the only real downside is the legal aspect. I wouldn't run gutted cats just because an O/R pipe is so damn cheap. A full exhaust is more than enough backpressure without cats. Your car will perform better at every RPM without cats restricting the flow.
Now that is not correct at all. I have had a catted x and an o/r x pipe with the same catback and same motor, there is more low end with the cats and the power curve definitely looked better with the cats in place. And with my catted setup on with just the catted x and flowmaster catback and no tune, my car put down 238/281 and my friend's full bolt-on GT with longtubes, o/r x, and LM1's put down 255/278. Now youre telling me that back pressure has nothing to do with the fact that i was putting down more torque and had a better power curve than a full bolt on car with no back pressure??? I highly think that you are mistaken my friend. You need a hell of a lot more power before no cats with LM1's will not hinder performance.
Old May 6, 2010 | 03:29 PM
  #19  
smitty2919's Avatar
smitty2919
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,797
From: KY, was MA
Default

Originally Posted by RyanK
it smells like a real car, and sounds like one too! just needs some more performance to back it all up!
exactly...it SOUNDS fast but is not lol. my brother had a 2000 GT with o/r X and magnapacks....thing was LOUD but also promoted speed he didn't really have lol

im running o/r x and regular magnaflow mufflers... not LOUD and "hey look at me" but it turn heads.

congrats tho man must sound like a beast
Old May 6, 2010 | 07:34 PM
  #20  
tbirdscwd's Avatar
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,039
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
Now that is not correct at all. I have had a catted x and an o/r x pipe with the same catback and same motor, there is more low end with the cats and the power curve definitely looked better with the cats in place. And with my catted setup on with just the catted x and flowmaster catback and no tune, my car put down 238/281 and my friend's full bolt-on GT with longtubes, o/r x, and LM1's put down 255/278. Now youre telling me that back pressure has nothing to do with the fact that i was putting down more torque and had a better power curve than a full bolt on car with no back pressure??? I highly think that you are mistaken my friend. You need a hell of a lot more power before no cats with LM1's will not hinder performance.
There are plenty of reasons you car made different numbers from when you had a catted x to an O/R x. Backpressure loss has most likely nothing to do with it. How about every dyno run even on the same day same dyno can yield different results. I'm assuming you didn't do a before and after dyno of the part on the same day either. What else had changed on your car from when you had the O/R pipe to when you ran the catted pipe?

You're second comparison is just plain retarded.....You are comparing torque curves from two completely different cars with completely different mods, completely different tunes, and probably done on different days , maybe even different dynos, and attributing the difference in your peak torque numbers to a backpressure issue? What? Get real.

We're not talking about running open shorty headers here....were talking about running full exhaust without cats. Do you really think your car needs catalytic converters to restrict you exhaust flow to make good torque?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.