Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Engine and Powertrain
- Ford Mustang V6 1994-2004: The Ultimate Air Intake Guide
Review and comparison of top products.
Browse all: Engine and Powertrain
should i get LCAs?
#21
It better not be tempting!!! BBK control arms are JUNK!!! Poly/Poly and BBK quality. You'll be tearing bushings out of them every week. Just get the MM XD LCA's and get spherical bushings for the stock upper control arms and call it a day.
#23
im not tempted enough to buy...im workin on buyin hoss's wet nitrous kit right now so when thats all situated ill look at the control arms again lol...thanks, ill be goin with MM as advised
#24
Yea Jazzer i know u can removed em if you're doing a PHB setup but by the way the post was it sounded like someone wanted to just "delete the uppers" and run with just lowercontrol arms. But if anyone tries this new method I want shotgun
#25
WTF I thought hoss JUST bought that kit???? He is still working on putting the setup together!!!
#26
There seems to be a bit of a "trend" to just install a PHB and leave everything else just as it is. This will address the rear-end waggle, which is good, but will not address the suspension bind or lousy RA created by the UCA's. The issue becomes one of cost, as to remove the UCA's, requires several things and probably a little over $1K to do it correctly. You would need to get a PHB or WL, TA and likely new springs as the rate differs from that of what is needed for UCA's. You really need FLSFC's as well, but many already have them.
I wish EVERYONE could ride in a modified SN95 rear suspension corrected in this way. I can guarantee, that EVERY ONE of you would love it and be impressed by the improvement of the 1/4 mile launches and the twisty-effect! This really just comes down to cost, as suspension falls off the list for most in lue of go fast stuff
Jazzer
#27
Yup, your axle would pretty much just spin around in a circle... real quick like
There seems to be a bit of a "trend" to just install a PHB and leave everything else just as it is. This will address the rear-end waggle, which is good, but will not address the suspension bind or lousy RA created by the UCA's. The issue becomes one of cost, as to remove the UCA's, requires several things and probably a little over $1K to do it correctly. You would need to get a PHB or WL, TA and likely new springs as the rate differs from that of what is needed for UCA's. You really need FLSFC's as well, but many already have them.
I wish EVERYONE could ride in a modified SN95 rear suspension corrected in this way. I can guarantee, that EVERY ONE of you would love it and be impressed by the improvement of the 1/4 mile launches and the twisty-effect! This really just comes down to cost, as suspension falls off the list for most in lue of go fast stuff
Jazzer
There seems to be a bit of a "trend" to just install a PHB and leave everything else just as it is. This will address the rear-end waggle, which is good, but will not address the suspension bind or lousy RA created by the UCA's. The issue becomes one of cost, as to remove the UCA's, requires several things and probably a little over $1K to do it correctly. You would need to get a PHB or WL, TA and likely new springs as the rate differs from that of what is needed for UCA's. You really need FLSFC's as well, but many already have them.
I wish EVERYONE could ride in a modified SN95 rear suspension corrected in this way. I can guarantee, that EVERY ONE of you would love it and be impressed by the improvement of the 1/4 mile launches and the twisty-effect! This really just comes down to cost, as suspension falls off the list for most in lue of go fast stuff
Jazzer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonnyBlazeGT
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
08-09-2015 10:19 AM