new spec clutch just in.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 501
From: United States
RE: new spec clutch just in.
clutches that use a high friction material like kevlar, etc are going to be more prone to some chatter. i have a little in reverse and on really low rpm takeoffs depending upon how much i slip it. there's none when the rpms are up or going through the gears. are centerforce clutches even rated? 90% more clamping force... on a stock stang... so thats like 385ft-tq? specs start at like 410ft-tq. driveability will be affected when running a superior style clutch, its just a known fact.
5th Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,105
From: Phoenix, AZ
RE: new spec clutch just in.
ORIGINAL: brutal_gt
clutches that use a high friction material like kevlar, etc are going to be more prone to some chatter. i have a little in reverse and on really low rpm takeoffs depending upon how much i slip it. there's none when the rpms are up or going through the gears. are centerforce clutches even rated? 90% more clamping force... on a stock stang... so thats like 385ft-tq? specs start at like 410ft-tq. driveability will be affected when running a superior style clutch, its just a known fact.
clutches that use a high friction material like kevlar, etc are going to be more prone to some chatter. i have a little in reverse and on really low rpm takeoffs depending upon how much i slip it. there's none when the rpms are up or going through the gears. are centerforce clutches even rated? 90% more clamping force... on a stock stang... so thats like 385ft-tq? specs start at like 410ft-tq. driveability will be affected when running a superior style clutch, its just a known fact.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I if you add 90% to say 300lb capacity then wouldn't that be 300 + 270 = 570?
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 501
From: United States
RE: new spec clutch just in.
ORIGINAL: 86HOGT
Correct me if I'm wrong but I if you add 90% to say 300lb capacity then wouldn't that be 300 + 270 = 570?
ORIGINAL: brutal_gt
clutches that use a high friction material like kevlar, etc are going to be more prone to some chatter. i have a little in reverse and on really low rpm takeoffs depending upon how much i slip it. there's none when the rpms are up or going through the gears. are centerforce clutches even rated? 90% more clamping force... on a stock stang... so thats like 385ft-tq? specs start at like 410ft-tq. driveability will be affected when running a superior style clutch, its just a known fact.
clutches that use a high friction material like kevlar, etc are going to be more prone to some chatter. i have a little in reverse and on really low rpm takeoffs depending upon how much i slip it. there's none when the rpms are up or going through the gears. are centerforce clutches even rated? 90% more clamping force... on a stock stang... so thats like 385ft-tq? specs start at like 410ft-tq. driveability will be affected when running a superior style clutch, its just a known fact.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I if you add 90% to say 300lb capacity then wouldn't that be 300 + 270 = 570?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM
