Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?
#12
RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?
there are no downsides to solid mounts. girls will love your car more since it will have a stronger vibrator effect. if you go with solids on the motor go with solids on the tranny. general rule of thumb is both mounts need to be the same material for optimum performance. solid-solid, poly-poly,rubber-rubber. call pst if you don't believe me. that's where i learned it from even though they are in the business to sell suspension parts. the suspension of the car is where you find the give if not you'll just be three wheeling cruising down the strip.
#14
RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?
That's crap. Why?
KO- matching is optimal, you're right. But the minimal amount of time you'll pick up in the 1320 isn't worth the money you'll spend on part wear. Race cars usually pull off solid trans mounts because their tube frames are a lot stiffer, and there is a lot less chassis flex. We don't have that convenience, so wear is a much bigger issue
KO- matching is optimal, you're right. But the minimal amount of time you'll pick up in the 1320 isn't worth the money you'll spend on part wear. Race cars usually pull off solid trans mounts because their tube frames are a lot stiffer, and there is a lot less chassis flex. We don't have that convenience, so wear is a much bigger issue
#16
RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?
Have u ever seen a car with a massive system over years? The entire interior falling apart because of vibrations? Now picture that in ur car with solid mounts. I don't see y u would run a solid when u can run polyurethane. Solids are great, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't wanna run them on a street car. There's a reason ford thought there should be a shock absorber there besides just comfort.
#17
RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?
ORIGINAL: LTnone
That's crap. Why?
KO- matching is optimal, you're right. But the minimal amount of time you'll pick up in the 1320 isn't worth the money you'll spend on part wear. Race cars usually pull off solid trans mounts because their tube frames are a lot stiffer, and there is a lot less chassis flex. We don't have that convenience, so wear is a much bigger issue
That's crap. Why?
KO- matching is optimal, you're right. But the minimal amount of time you'll pick up in the 1320 isn't worth the money you'll spend on part wear. Race cars usually pull off solid trans mounts because their tube frames are a lot stiffer, and there is a lot less chassis flex. We don't have that convenience, so wear is a much bigger issue
#18
RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?
here is a nice alternative: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...p;autoview=sku
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
12-27-2021 08:09 PM
logan409
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
10
09-26-2015 07:43 PM