5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 03:21 PM
  #11  
w8less's Avatar
w8less
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,396
From: KY
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

yea don't go with a solid mount for the tranny. the tranny is mount is suppose to have some deflection
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #12  
KOMan's Avatar
KOMan
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 95
From:
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

there are no downsides to solid mounts. girls will love your car more since it will have a stronger vibrator effect. if you go with solids on the motor go with solids on the tranny. general rule of thumb is both mounts need to be the same material for optimum performance. solid-solid, poly-poly,rubber-rubber. call pst if you don't believe me. that's where i learned it from even though they are in the business to sell suspension parts. the suspension of the car is where you find the give if not you'll just be three wheeling cruising down the strip.
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 04:03 PM
  #13  
PX429's Avatar
PX429
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,293
From: OC, Cali
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

There is a huge warning on the box saying If i run solid motor mounts I must run a solid Trans mount
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 04:23 PM
  #14  
LTnone's Avatar
LTnone
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,897
From:
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

That's crap. Why?

KO- matching is optimal, you're right. But the minimal amount of time you'll pick up in the 1320 isn't worth the money you'll spend on part wear. Race cars usually pull off solid trans mounts because their tube frames are a lot stiffer, and there is a lot less chassis flex. We don't have that convenience, so wear is a much bigger issue
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 11:07 PM
  #15  
tinman's Avatar
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,103
From: Arizona
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

The 10.70 Dodge Challenger I raced for years had steel motor mounts and a standard, NAPA store trans mount.
Never had any trouble............
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 11:59 PM
  #16  
rcdblink716's Avatar
rcdblink716
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 585
From:
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

Have u ever seen a car with a massive system over years? The entire interior falling apart because of vibrations? Now picture that in ur car with solid mounts. I don't see y u would run a solid when u can run polyurethane. Solids are great, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't wanna run them on a street car. There's a reason ford thought there should be a shock absorber there besides just comfort.
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 04:09 AM
  #17  
KOMan's Avatar
KOMan
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 95
From:
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

ORIGINAL: LTnone

That's crap. Why?

KO- matching is optimal, you're right. But the minimal amount of time you'll pick up in the 1320 isn't worth the money you'll spend on part wear. Race cars usually pull off solid trans mounts because their tube frames are a lot stiffer, and there is a lot less chassis flex. We don't have that convenience, so wear is a much bigger issue
if i built a tube frame car i would use motor plates instead of motor mounts. if one is concerned about wear, use the rubber or poly mounts. i've never seen it but from what i've read and heard that solid motor mounts and a softer tranny mount leads the cracked tranny cases and bellhousing problems. then there's someone who could argue the same about solid-solid set-up too and i would then say some of both are part of misaligned parts due to manufacturer's tolerances and also installing mechanic.motor plates can cause serious problems if the installing mechanic doesn't take the time to set them right and weld them in properly. the 1320's fine but there's more to life than the 1320, there's curves and hills. driveline alignment is critical for longevity
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #18  
LesteR723's Avatar
LesteR723
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,486
From:
Default RE: Downside: Solid Motor Mounts?

here is a nice alternative: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...p;autoview=sku
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwog666
Pipes, Boost & Juice
11
Dec 27, 2021 08:09 PM
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
Jul 26, 2016 01:20 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
Explosive
Street/Strip
17
Oct 2, 2015 07:45 AM
logan409
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
10
Sep 26, 2015 07:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.