5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Cats or No Cats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2008, 12:31 AM
  #1  
mpinkorea
Thread Starter
 
mpinkorea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default Cats or No Cats

Ok so I have checked the threads here and have not really read an answer to my question. I have a stock 89 LX 5.0. The owner before the previous owner decided to gut the cats out. I want to replace the exhaust with a complete aftermarket one. My questions are:

1. Will removing the cats in the form of an "H" or "X" pipe (off-road)adversely affect the engine (idle, hesitation, fuel mixture)?
2. What would be necessary to switch from cats to no cats as far as connections (smog pump, O2 sensor, breather tubes)?
3. Other than emissions what is the reason for cats, are they just to heat the exhaust more to burn off more emmisions?

My state does not require emissions testing and the car is only driven about 2000 miles a year, due to weather and not wanting to have it wrecked. I am pondering going with a complete BBK system (headers all the way back), but would like opinions on what may be a better option. Some things i would like to hear about are fitment of systems and sound (interior and exterior).

Thank-you in advance.
mpinkorea is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:44 PM
  #2  
eliptical_illusions
 
eliptical_illusions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 9
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

well if you want your car to sound good i would go with the off-road H or X pipe...they sound a hell of a lot better...and there is nothing you have to do to switch it other then buying the part...there is no plugs or wires or tubes or anything that will change...help any...me personally i would go off-road X pipe...it sounds better and allows better flow
eliptical_illusions is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 07:48 PM
  #3  
PJB
5th Gear Member
 
PJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rotterdam, NY
Posts: 3,333
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

Most offroad pipes have the tubes for the smog crap on them but you can eliminate the smog crap too.
Here's a sound clip of my car with h/c/i, short headers, BBK offroad X pipe and Flowmaster Force II mufflers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRtp8UcB79I
PJB is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 08:16 PM
  #4  
zeekstr
2nd Gear Member
 
zeekstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 192
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

Ditch the cats.
zeekstr is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:57 PM
  #5  
Jaked4e
1st Gear Member
 
Jaked4e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 86
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

go with no cats man deffinitly. sounds much better
Jaked4e is offline  
Old 05-15-2008, 10:30 PM
  #6  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

ORIGINAL: mpinkorea

Ok so I have checked the threads here and have not really read an answer to my question. I have a stock 89 LX 5.0. The owner before the previous owner decided to gut the cats out. I want to replace the exhaust with a complete aftermarket one. My questions are:

1. Will removing the cats in the form of an "H" or "X" pipe (off-road)adversely affect the engine (idle, hesitation, fuel mixture)?
2. What would be necessary to switch from cats to no cats as far as connections (smog pump, O2 sensor, breather tubes)?
3. Other than emissions what is the reason for cats, are they just to heat the exhaust more to burn off more emmisions?

My state does not require emissions testing and the car is only driven about 2000 miles a year, due to weather and not wanting to have it wrecked. I am pondering going with a complete BBK system (headers all the way back), but would like opinions on what may be a better option. Some things i would like to hear about are fitment of systems and sound (interior and exterior).

Thank-you in advance.
cats are there to reduce emissions..it is a chemical change/process that occurs inside to change the emissions output.....end result is reduction in hydrocarbons, Nox, ect ect........just put the o2's in the new h or x pipe and hook up air tube and drive away to fun
mjr46 is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 12:15 AM
  #7  
rebel_yell
2nd Gear Member
 
rebel_yell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 154
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

also if you replace the h-pipe you can take the old cats to a recycling place and they will buy them from you.
rebel_yell is offline  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:12 AM
  #8  
mpinkorea
Thread Starter
 
mpinkorea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default RE: Cats or No Cats

Thanks guys this helped my decision. I'm going to start checking some prices and get this thing buttoned up.
mpinkorea is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ak98
GT S197 General Discussion
11
02-18-2023 08:36 AM
Vrooom
4.6L General Discussion
13
02-21-2016 05:25 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM
JDWalton
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
8
09-24-2015 08:47 PM
trashxtrash
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
09-20-2015 10:49 PM



Quick Reply: Cats or No Cats



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.