5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Head comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2005 | 01:06 AM
  #1  
2slow4u's Avatar
2slow4u
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
From:
Default Head comparison

We all know that the AFR's and Edlebrocks are usually the best heads. I know this. But I want to know just how much better are they than a set of aftermarket alumminum GT-40's. What can a good port job do for these. I will probably go with Edlebrock victor Jr.'s but have recently seriously started to think about some aluminum GT-40s. I have a rock solid bottom end and it is a nitrous (mostly) motor. It would be nice to save a few hundred bucs for say 20-30 horespower for AFR's etc. versus some GT's. Anyone know of a good p&p shop that I could send em to.
Old May 4, 2005 | 01:09 AM
  #2  
birdman076's Avatar
birdman076
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 299
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

Link below will take you to a nice head comparison page, just pick 2 heads in the drop down menu to compare flow numbers. Enjoy!!!


http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/630.shtml
Old May 4, 2005 | 01:35 AM
  #3  
2slow4u's Avatar
2slow4u
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

Thats a cool feature but does anyone else have any personal experience and or ideas?
Old May 4, 2005 | 01:43 AM
  #4  
Chris C's Avatar
Chris C
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 280
From: Colorado Springs
Default RE: Head comparison

Nice site birdman! Check out the flow on the yates [:-]
Old May 4, 2005 | 03:32 AM
  #5  
StangerGT's Avatar
StangerGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 161
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

screw the afr's, go for the jegs /Kaase SB-Ford Cylinder Heads, they made 511 HP @ 7800 rpm on a stock 302 with those ,Edelbrock Victor intake with a Holley 750 carb and a 256 degree mechanical roller cam.
Old May 4, 2005 | 06:10 PM
  #6  
2slow4u's Avatar
2slow4u
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

anyways about the head comparison.....
Old May 4, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #7  
95_302_StangMan's Avatar
95_302_StangMan
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 543
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

wow, i never knew the yates were that good.
Old May 4, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #8  
vfast's Avatar
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,394
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

some of those head there are custom built ..like the canifields....most are the 18 or 20 degree heads with 2.02 valve
Old May 4, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #9  
rcdblink716's Avatar
rcdblink716
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 585
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

The AFR heads are by far the best. Every test I have seen of sbf heads has had them up top. On a stock 302 with only a dual plane weiand and a 4 barrel, they made 100 hp more. This is more than the trick flow and edelbrock heads. If you don't believe me, go here http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/116_0307_ford/ They made over 400 hp on a completely stock carbeurated 5.0 with AFR heads and roller rockers.
Old May 4, 2005 | 11:30 PM
  #10  
2slow4u's Avatar
2slow4u
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
From:
Default RE: Head comparison

Very impressive. Almost makes me wanna use my stock cam....... or not.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
mustangheaven
Motor Swap Section
3
Jan 3, 2016 11:20 AM
kevsgt
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
Oct 9, 2015 10:12 PM
tj@steeda
Florida Regional Chapter
0
Sep 30, 2015 08:04 PM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
Sep 30, 2015 03:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.