Spec or Centerforce?
04-24-2009, 09:05 PM
#21
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
you want to go that far mjr46?...then quit throwing comments to take shot's at me...
are these napa clutches balanced?..mine wasn't
are napa clutches sustained to stress cracks ..mine was..
do napa clutches lose there clamping force when they get hot..yep just like a stock replacement clutch would do.
wouldn't you want a clutch to be able to absorb some of the shock rather than letting it beat on your stock t-5 or even your high $$$ transmission.
when i was putting my cj5 together,and trying locate certain parts for my 350/t-5 swap..centerforce even reccomended not using "stock replacement" on pos 180hp 350..for the fact it's hp rating is blah but the tq rating would be enough to destroy a stocker.
a better designed..higher quality clutch would be a wiser decision over something that barely surpasses stock oem standards IMO
are these napa clutches balanced?..mine wasn't
are napa clutches sustained to stress cracks ..mine was..
do napa clutches lose there clamping force when they get hot..yep just like a stock replacement clutch would do.
wouldn't you want a clutch to be able to absorb some of the shock rather than letting it beat on your stock t-5 or even your high $$$ transmission.
when i was putting my cj5 together,and trying locate certain parts for my 350/t-5 swap..centerforce even reccomended not using "stock replacement" on pos 180hp 350..for the fact it's hp rating is blah but the tq rating would be enough to destroy a stocker.
a better designed..higher quality clutch would be a wiser decision over something that barely surpasses stock oem standards IMO
Last edited by mjr46; 04-24-2009 at 09:39 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
