VicsGT

Which one do you guys prefer? MAC,BBK, Densecharger, etc.?

piston

<FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>I use a WMS. But from what I've read I'd probably get the Densecharger between those listed.</FONT></P><edited><editID>piston</editID><editDate>37938.567037037</editDate></edited>

pimp

do you know antthing about 5.0's</P>


</P>

89muscle

explain

VicsGT

what do you mean do I know anything about 5.0's?? It looks like that was your first post and boy was it a real winner I know most of you guys are for making your own, but I dont have time and my sister is looking ot get me something for my B-day.

88SaleenStang

2 1/2" Electrical PVC with a 90 degree bend, two 2 1/2" rubber couplings, a desired cone air filter...I used K&amp;N it all cost me bout $12 for the stuff from Home Depot and $30 for the filter..... and I think it works great...performes like a MAC but cheaper and well if ur looking for looks go with a MAC....

95Stealth302

Densecharger is the way to fly. The only bad think about CAIs in a 94-95 GT, if I remember what you have correctly, is that Densecharger only gives a tube into the MAF and not from the MAF to the manifold. They say that this is due to the fact that an extra tube really doesn't help power at all over stock. However, densecharger will in theory be a better choice because of the chrome in BBK and MAC getting hot with engine temperature. Most guys say this is a bunch rubbish, and I cant really prove that there is a difference. MAC, BBK, and Densecharger are all great.</P>


Personally, I have a K&amp;N Short ram that works just fine, not really any difference in performance between the Short Ram and CAI. Just preferance.</P>