5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

351 Cleavland vs Windsor...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2006, 02:11 PM
  #21  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 351 Cleavland vs Windsor...

I was going to get a windsor out of a Bronco for $300 bucks (whole motor) and it was already pulled. I dont know how expensive they are around you but in Jersey they sell for practically nothing.
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 05:46 PM
  #22  
wildcobrar
3rd Gear Member
 
wildcobrar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 577
Default RE: 351 Cleavland vs Windsor...

I see your point, but given the Cleveland has a stronger crank, block, and rods, and if you land a 4V Cleveland(4 barrel carb version) you get canted valve (yes bigger and wider) heads with 2.19 intake valves and 1.71 exhaust valves(largest Windsor factory valves are 1.84 and 1.5 intake and exhaust) you get the better and cheaper performance with the Cleveland if you are on a budget. Right cam choice will make over 400HP with stock heads(do that with a Windsor). Personally I have built many small block Fords and if you do not have the $$$ for the aftermarket heads than a Cleveland is a very solid choice. If you drop a Windsor or Cleveland into a Fox Stang you still need to buy an oil pan and headers so that part of the $$$ is out of the factor of cost. Just my thought, but to each their own right? If you choose a Windsor, go with a truck Windsor because they come with stronger rods than the car Windsor.

Another good thing about the Windsor vs Cleveland is that though the Windsor has a slightly better rod ratio the Cleveland has lighter pistons and this equates to less reciprocating mass resulting in more strength and HP, along with a quicker reving engine. You also gain more hood clearance with the Cleveland as it is slightly shorter and smaller then the larger Windsor. I have an excessive amount of room to spare in my 90 Mustang's engine bay with the Cleveland in there. Build what ever you like but never rule out the simple and cheap possibilities.
wildcobrar is offline  
Old 01-23-2006, 09:50 PM
  #23  
kartracer55
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
kartracer55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 519
Default RE: 351 Cleavland vs Windsor...

ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT

I was going to get a windsor out of a Bronco for $300 bucks (whole motor) and it was already pulled. I dont know how expensive they are around you but in Jersey they sell for practically nothing.
Well would ya look at that... Im from NJ too



Jim
kartracer55 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
teeeeg67
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
9
09-01-2015 11:53 PM
steelers743
New Member Area
3
08-31-2015 07:16 AM
Mustangs of Illinois
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
4
08-22-2015 10:00 PM
89blueslug
General Tech
1
08-10-2015 07:20 AM



Quick Reply: 351 Cleavland vs Windsor...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.