5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

roller rockers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2008, 05:03 PM
  #11  
wildsurfer92
3rd Gear Member
 
wildsurfer92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 846
Default

so whats the difff from 1.6 and 1.7 rockers?
wildsurfer92 is offline  
Old 10-06-2008, 11:20 PM
  #12  
.boB
3rd Gear Member
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 939
Default

The lift ratio. A rocker arm is a lever, with the short side over the push rod and the long side over the valve tip. If you look at cam specs, you'll see lobe lift, lets say that's 0.500" (that's unheard of for a SBF, but we'll use it anyway)

If the rocker arm ratio was 1.0, that means it's 1:1. Meaning for every .1" of lobe lift, you'll get .1" of valve lift. Stock Windors are usually 1.6, which really means 1:1.6. So for every .1" of lobe lift, you'll get .16" of valve lift.

Using the above example of .500" of lobe lift, a 1.6 ratio rocker arm will give you .800" of valve lift (.500 x 1.6).

If you increase the ratio, you'll get more lift and more duration. That will usually give you a little more power.

If you increase the ratio to 1.7, valve lift is now .850" of valve lift. It's only an increase of .050" of lift, but it does make a differance.

This simple swap also provides about 2-3* more effective duration out of the cam. Wait! Don't say it yet! Some one is about to shout that the only way to increase durition is to change the cam. Keep in mind that effective valve lift is generally accepted to be .050". That's at the point where the gasses start to move, and make an effect on the power band. An increased rocker ratio will get to .050" lift about 1-1.5* sooner, and last 1-1.5* longer. Effectivly increasing duration.
.boB is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 07:35 AM
  #13  
projectresto83
M.A.D. Motorsports
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,014
Default

Pretty much what he said. But like it is shown in the Bolt on myths thread I posted earlier 1.7's on a stock setup doesn't always help.

.boB, Do you have any pics of your FFR Roadster???? I can't wait to get the money to build one.
projectresto83 is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:03 AM
  #14  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

1.7 on a stock motor is a waste
mjr46 is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 04:27 PM
  #15  
.boB
3rd Gear Member
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 939
Default

>> .boB, Do you have any pics of your FFR Roadster???? I can't wait to get the money to build one. <<


I'm at work now, so I can't access the site. But visit photobucket, and do a search on "bobcowan". There's a bunch of pictures there, including the dyno sheet.
.boB is offline  
Old 10-07-2008, 05:38 PM
  #16  
projectresto83
M.A.D. Motorsports
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,014
Default

Kick *** .boB, I have been wanting one of those cars since I was a kid. Did you buy the engine as a crate from FFR or put it together yourself? I love those intakes!
projectresto83 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sixer4Life
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
5
10-12-2015 04:26 AM
69MustangCoupe393cid
Archive - Parts For Sale
2
10-03-2015 10:33 AM
uedlose
Archive - Parts For Sale
1
09-30-2015 08:01 AM
Sixer4Life
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:05 AM
JDWalton
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
8
09-24-2015 08:47 PM



Quick Reply: roller rockers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.