I can't believe the prices!!! :-}
#11
I picked a Notch to build for two reasons. It's lighter and the short solid roof makes the car stronger. When I was looking, No sunroofs, No T-Tops, No Verts and No hatch. Closed trunk area and soild roof make a better platform to build high power on. It's still one of the ugliest econoboxs to ever roll down the Ford Assembly line.
coupes are fukking sexy its just that simple
#13
In a mustang racer world a stock 93 is not the most sought after car because the pistons are the cheap hyperec. crap. But like jasper said people will pay for what they want. The ws6's are nice cars but just because they have more power doesn't mean I would buy one. Parts for it are too expensive and from what I have seen they don't last like our cars do. People love notch backs because they are the lightest of the 3 fox models so it makes a great drag car. you are not looking into getting rid of your car are you? I hope not.
- On a side note, I still think the fox's are not expensive to build because it doesn't take alot to make them fast, but the parts do add up fairly quickly in cost. I actually did a comparison in cost between stroked 350 and a stroked 351 and the results are interesting to say the least. LS1's and further on the other hand require very little if anything to get them running fast. Hell the stock heads are great in themselves. That saves alot of money right there.
Last edited by DeltaElite121; 11-23-2008 at 09:00 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post