5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Everything Twin Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 05:28 AM
  #21  
Bombk2's Avatar
Bombk2
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 6
From: Oklahoma
Default

I was already juggling between SCing and TT, and that sure didn't help.

Good things about both. I've looked at both Vortechs & Whipples.

Whats this about Oil Pumps breaking on these motors?

I sent TT50.com an email, they don't post how long the wait list is.
Old Jan 18, 2013 | 07:54 PM
  #22  
moosestang's Avatar
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,278
From: Gainesville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Ditty
Then you don't like superchargers. They all use automotive oil as lubrication. Boost creap is due to not picking the correct turbo for your application and not having the correct wastegate for your application.

Turbos: If done correctly, keep the engine bay uncluttered; More flexible mounting positions to fit personal preference; More efficient overall; more flexible power depending on how you want to set 'em up; uses waste heat energy from exhaust vise stealing energy from the drive belt; just sounds better to me; turbo acts as a muffler in exhaust allowing you to be legal if you like it loud by running straigh-pipes; MUCH easier to piece together your own system; overall more fuel efficient; I'd rather replace one expensive turbo than one expensive SCer.
Those are just a few.

SCing: Want more power, you HAVE to buy either a smaller pully or different supercharger; look gaudy sitting on top of the engine; limited mounting positions due to belt drive; limited intercooling options per specific type; EVERYONE has a dang SCer....like to be a little different; HATE that SCer whine ALL of the time.
Just a few.

Also, there is a reason why MOST OEMs use turbos or switch to turbos for forced induction. Turbos are MORE reliable, MORE fuel Efficient and overall Cheaper to purchase than SCers.

I didn't say anything about automotive oil. I said "the motor oil". You need to work on your reading comprehension. Manufacturers use turbos because of cost, period. No need to bring up fuel efficiency when talking about a turbo or supercharged v8, but you'd be hard pressed to see a difference in mpg if just adding a whipple and driving normally. Just ask anyone here with a supercharger if their mpg went down during normal driving.

SC'ers only whine when you pass 25% throttle and start making boost. Edelbrock's doesn't make any noise, nor does Kenne bell.

SC'ers are easier to tune. that's why everyone has one. Less likely to blow your motor.

Name a turbo kit that doesn't suffer from boost creep.

Last edited by moosestang; Jan 18, 2013 at 08:00 PM.
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 09:02 PM
  #23  
04mineralgreyGT's Avatar
04mineralgreyGT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,298
From: ALABAMA
Default

I prefer a supercharger as well.
Old Jan 19, 2013 | 11:08 PM
  #24  
Slowbra302's Avatar
Slowbra302
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 390
From: California
Default

Big turbos sound fun, I like superchargers though lol
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 08:26 AM
  #25  
Ditty's Avatar
Ditty
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 445
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by moosestang

Name a turbo kit that doesn't suffer from boost creep.
The turbo on my 7.3L Powerstroke has NEVER suffered from boost creep. Even w/out a WG...it hits 31psi and stays there. This is on a rebuilt stock turbo, modified by myself with a 1.0A/R exhaust housing and a better compressor wheel to stop the surge that was terrible. It's been over 100K miles since the rebuild and ZERO surge or boost creep.

Stopping boost creep is a science of matching turbos to the application. Tuning has a TON to do with this. And turbos are no harder to tune than a SCer. All that is REALLY needed is a RRFPR (Rising Rate Fuel Pressure Regulator) vise a 1:1 regulator. Those that can't tune turbos haven't tried very hard.
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 08:42 AM
  #26  
awbreyjd's Avatar
awbreyjd
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 219
From: Texas
Default

turbo's are very tuneable. Also you can mod a compressor side to limit/eliminate surge. The right compressor/exhaust side, on the appropriate setup is rather smooth much like a SC. I just wanted to get away from turbo's on this car. I had it on the last but have never gone Supercharged and wanted to try it. I like both. but its personal preference for sure.
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #27  
Uncoolron's Avatar
Uncoolron
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 106
From: Virginia
Default

I personaly like turbo also since they are not parasitic energy power adder. Just like any other power adder you need a right tune for your application. I don't have a turbo'd Mustang but I have turbo'd 4 banger that I used to daily drive. The feeling of the power boost is unsurpassed and I love the sound of the BOV.

I've driven a supercharged and the power boost does not excite me so much as red- lining my 5.0 thru the gears.

I would suggest driving one of each and decide from there.
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 09:09 PM
  #28  
danzcool's Avatar
danzcool
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,071
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Ditty
The turbo on my 7.3L Powerstroke has NEVER suffered from boost creep. Even w/out a WG...it hits 31psi and stays there. This is on a rebuilt stock turbo, modified by myself with a 1.0A/R exhaust housing and a better compressor wheel to stop the surge that was terrible. It's been over 100K miles since the rebuild and ZERO surge or boost creep.

Stopping boost creep is a science of matching turbos to the application. Tuning has a TON to do with this. And turbos are no harder to tune than a SCer. All that is REALLY needed is a RRFPR (Rising Rate Fuel Pressure Regulator) vise a 1:1 regulator. Those that can't tune turbos haven't tried very hard.
Yeah, boost creep is a matter of a system that wasn't engineered/matched correctly, right size of wastegate and compressor/turbine matching to the engine.
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 10:42 PM
  #29  
jayman33's Avatar
jayman33
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 962
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by moosestang
I didn't say anything about automotive oil. I said "the motor oil". You need to work on your reading comprehension. Manufacturers use turbos because of cost, period. No need to bring up fuel efficiency when talking about a turbo or supercharged v8, but you'd be hard pressed to see a difference in mpg if just adding a whipple and driving normally. Just ask anyone here with a supercharger if their mpg went down during normal driving.

SC'ers only whine when you pass 25% throttle and start making boost. Edelbrock's doesn't make any noise, nor does Kenne bell.

SC'ers are easier to tune. that's why everyone has one. Less likely to blow your motor.

Name a turbo kit that doesn't suffer from boost creep.
My whippled Mustang's gas mileage went down during normal driving, city driving is the worst for SC cars. You should know that, kenne bell whines, a lot. How many Kenne bells have you heard in person? SCer's are easier to tune? Do you tune? Or are you just claiming that with no weight to back that up? 25% throttle is only when you hear whine? Where do you get these bogus facts? Also, every SC'er makes noise after break in and especially after opening the airway such as an open airbox/ filter.
You're relating manufacturer cost on turbos? Have you seen the kind of OEM turbos they use?
Name a legit turbo kit that does suffer boost creep, that was installed correctly. Turbos are not harder to tune, I don't know where you get your facts.... Turbos are however more difficult to install, if you don't know what your doing or inexperienced.
Before you start posting facts, make sure they carry some weight behind them.
Lastly, your tone is annoying. You're not special so don't act like it.

Last edited by jayman33; Jan 21, 2013 at 10:45 PM.
Old Jan 22, 2013 | 08:09 AM
  #30  
awbreyjd's Avatar
awbreyjd
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 219
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by jayman33
My whippled Mustang's gas mileage went down during normal driving, city driving is the worst for SC cars. You should know that, kenne bell whines, a lot. How many Kenne bells have you heard in person? SCer's are easier to tune? Do you tune? Or are you just claiming that with no weight to back that up? 25% throttle is only when you hear whine? Where do you get these bogus facts? Also, every SC'er makes noise after break in and especially after opening the airway such as an open airbox/ filter.
You're relating manufacturer cost on turbos? Have you seen the kind of OEM turbos they use?
Name a legit turbo kit that does suffer boost creep, that was installed correctly. Turbos are not harder to tune, I don't know where you get your facts.... Turbos are however more difficult to install, if you don't know what your doing or inexperienced.
Before you start posting facts, make sure they carry some weight behind them.
Lastly, your tone is annoying. You're not special so don't act like it.
Not to rain on your rant but SC'ers are easier to tune because of the predictable/repeatable boost curve. Turbo's fluctuate much more. Howerever a competent tuner does not have trouble with either. My vortech broken in has no whine that can be heard in cabin and only heard outside the vehicle when hood is up. However it is the v-3 self contained. The other engine oil cooled vortechs I have seen are audibly louder but not all are loud. As many dyno days has i have hosted, no all whine. Most but not all. A majority of turbos do creep. Simply because most people dont match the most efficient but instead the most powerful setup for what they think. Most of us dont have engineering degree to match airflow through the engine. The install difficulty is all about the car/engine and style of turbo/sc'er. A srt4 neon is incredibally easy to install a new turbo but going Sc'er on that engine is rediculous. In general turbos are more involved but not always harder. Dont state opinions and then start internet slapping someone elses "facts". And to clarify none of my statements above are facts more opinions due to seeing more cars on the dyno in variety of setups than most owners.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 AM.