Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Scarebird?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #11  
highhilleer's Avatar
highhilleer
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 490
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

If you look at the specs on the MC the bore is the same for the disc and drum, so you could push enough fluid. That leaves the issue of the residual pressure valve. I read somewhere, but I'll be a monkey if I can find it again, that the residual pressure valve is either external to the MC or at the outlet port allowing it to be removed. It's something I'm still researching as the mc put in my car by the PO has paper work that indicates it can be used for either disc or drum brakes, but no info on the residual valve.
Old May 2, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #12  
6mustang6's Avatar
6mustang6
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,645
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

as quoted from the scarebird website. You can use stock, 67-72 M/C and the stock distribution block.

5. We suggest using the stock 1967-72 disc/drum master cylinder for 1964-72, and use the 1973 for 1973. You can use the existing drum distribuiton valve, or upgrade to a disc/drum unit. If you are switching to disc/disc, keep the drum /drum block and use an adjustable prop valve in the rear line.
Use the following parts:

Rotors 1964-69 1968-69 Ford Mustang
1970-73 1970-73 Ford Mustang

Calipers 1983-95 S10 4WD

Hoses 1979-85 Cadillac Eldorado
Old May 2, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #13  
Soaring's Avatar
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,565
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

Yeah Charles, we can read. But, is that factual? Again, without a person who has actually done this conversion, it is still questionable.
Old May 2, 2006 | 08:36 PM
  #14  
ideal_mustangs's Avatar
ideal_mustangs
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,104
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

To me it seems like if your using all those different parts from different vehicles, you going to get too much fluid or not enough fluid to somewhere. Just my opinion though.
Old May 2, 2006 | 11:54 PM
  #15  
6mustang6's Avatar
6mustang6
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,645
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

why should that cause that???? or is it because it has some GM parts on there that you all are skeptical??????
Old May 3, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #16  
degins's Avatar
degins
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 229
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?


ORIGINAL: Soaring

Yeah Charles, we can read. But, is that factual? Again, without a person who has actually done this conversion, it is still questionable.
Speaking to your remarks about the MC and PV. I agree the original 67 drum/drum is not suitable. Not only is it a drum/drum MC that has a undesirable residual pressure valve, it also does not have a large enough fluid reservoir on the front circuit. All front disc rear drum systems have a PV in some form. The 67 distribution block does not have a PV. The phrase "penny wise, pound foolish" comes to mind. I find it hard to believe that Scarebird makes such claims.

I also agree that there is a lot more to a front brake swap kit than a set of calipers and rotors. The CSRP SWAP kit has over 40 small parts included in additon to new spindles and splash shields, slotted rotors, calipers, MC, PV, hoses, pads, bearings and seals. No research or run around needed. Even the thread locker and caliper lube is included.

Old May 3, 2006 | 12:49 AM
  #17  
6mustang6's Avatar
6mustang6
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,645
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

yeah, i would probably go with the entire kit. I get impatiant, and would be mad trying to get parts together.
Old May 3, 2006 | 12:55 AM
  #18  
badazz68stang's Avatar
badazz68stang
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 445
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

but there arent alot of parts to trackdown. three different things that any parts store would have is all that is needed. i just want to talk to someone who has actually installed this kit and see what they have to say, i think that would be the only difinitive way to know the quality of this product.
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:19 AM
  #19  
ideal_mustangs's Avatar
ideal_mustangs
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,104
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?

They thing about it is though, you'll get the parts and put them on, then you find you need something else, like a brake fitting adapter, then maybe another braket for the brake lines, etc. BTW, wouldn't the newer chevy and cadillac parts be metric?
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:24 AM
  #20  
degins's Avatar
degins
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 229
From:
Default RE: Scarebird?


ORIGINAL: badazz68stang

but there arent alot of parts to trackdown. three different things that any parts store would have is all that is needed. i just want to talk to someone who has actually installed this kit and see what they have to say, i think that would be the only difinitive way to know the quality of this product.

With all due respect, I predict at least 20 trips to the parts store and another couple dozen post asking something like "what is that little part that attaches to the caliper and is it really needed".



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.