gothand look up a gt500e thats it car was designed by chip foose for the remake of gone in 60 sec. shake only thing i see different is the steering wheels the 68 has a ugly one but the 67 one looks like a 3 spoke with a pillow glued in it

 

67 and 68 are pretty much the same car. If the interior is any different, its not much. My buddy has a 68, and the only major differences are on the outside. It has a few more blinker lights on the side of the body that the 67 lacks, and the side scoups vary. As for which is better, its all personal opinion. However, one note, the 68 does have a slightly different steering box, you can remove it without disassembling the front of the car But with that said, I do prefer the 67. Btw, I am thinking about selling my 67 coupe, so holler at me if it looks like anything you would be interested in.

 

LCC, how is it that yourcar does not have the side markers on the rear quarter panels. You have the best of both years.I like the 67' because of the no side markers, but I like how yours looks because it's the rear quarters that make it look sleeker.

 

from looking at lots of pics i kinda like the 67's better. i dont know why, but i just do.

 

cause 67's are the "heat" (or so my nephew likes to say)

 

There's a link from this forum that tells you some of the differences.

https://mustangforums.com/timeline/1968-ford-mustang/

You sure you don't want to keep your 65' ?



http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2576315


[/align]

 

do i want to keep it? YES!! but i really do perfer the 67 because in my eyes it just looks so much meaner.

 

If that's what you have to do to get what you REALLY want, then by all means, do it.