Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 01:08 AM
  #1  
shikoz's Avatar
shikoz
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 179
From:
Default Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

I was told that a smaller combustion chamber combined with flat top pistons will increase the Compression ratio. Is this true? I've got stock rebuild going with flat top pistons and I'mthinking of usinga set of C6AE heads that have a cc of 53. I'm not going for uber performance. What I want is a daily driver type of engine. Will this combo give me too much compression? If so, whatdo I need to change to match this compression. Are differnet heads the answer? Thanks

misc.
carb- 4100 autolite (as of right now)
exhaust- HiPo manifolds (as of right now)
intake- stock 4V (again, as of right now)
distributor- stock with petronix
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 01:29 AM
  #2  
66GTKFB's Avatar
66GTKFB
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,623
From:
Default RE: Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

It's possible - if the compression height of the piston is tall enough. Otherwise you wind up with a lot of expensive partsin a two barrel engine. There are also domed pistons and notched pistons to consider. They can raise your compression ratio to the point that you will need 100 octane gas.
Jim
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #3  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,871
From: West Virginia
Default RE: Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

hey shikoz man flat tops with 53 cc heads wow cool!!! now add a cam and dual plane intake 4 barrel and headers and you got a great street machine!!! anyway to answer your question yes flat tops and smaller chambers up the comp ratio but be careful pump gas and high compression don't mix well with todays gas unless you use aluminum heads I used a .200 dome piston and 58 cc afr heads on my 85 gt mustang and I rum 93 octane and have never had an issue with detonation on my 66 I went with flat top forged light weight pistons and used 69 302 heads with a triangle shape combustion chamber don't know the cc's think it's somewhere between 59 and 62?? anyway it works great with 93 octane and no detonation![8D]
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 01:54 AM
  #4  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default RE: Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

short answer, flat tops and those small chambers - you'll be fine.

worst case you'll be running 93, which isnt that big of a deal.
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 02:34 AM
  #5  
shikoz's Avatar
shikoz
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 179
From:
Default RE: Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

I kind of expected to run 93/92 (depending on where you're located) octane in the car after the engine is complete. I started thinking about this compression thing when I was trying to figure out if I wanted to go with a dual plane intake, headers, etc. It seems pointless to have high compression without running the goods that help the engine breathe better. Hmmmm. . . more thinking to do.

Please let me know if there are any more thoughts on this. Thanks!
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 02:38 AM
  #6  
my77stang's Avatar
my77stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,007
From: Citrus County, FL
Default RE: Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

higher compression (within reason) is always a good thing.

obviously, if your going to be rebuilding you might as well slap a better intake/carb/cam/exhaust on there and let the motor breathe.

you'll be VERY happy you did
Old Jun 30, 2007 | 02:55 AM
  #7  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Smaller combustion/ flat top pistons

A lot of it depends on build too. I'm running 61cc chamber AFR heads on my 302 with flat tops and 9.44:1 static compression with an agressive ignition curve and jetting on the lean side, and I run it on 89oct without any issues. Of course, it also has a higher than stock rod ratio too
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lincolnshibuya
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
4
Jul 5, 2020 03:05 AM
Dokilar
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Oct 16, 2015 08:13 PM
chrisdbassplayer
2010-current S197 Appearance Section
4
Oct 13, 2015 06:53 PM
Bokeo
Street/Strip
6
Oct 10, 2015 08:28 PM
b8checker
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
8
Oct 8, 2015 12:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.