Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Steel cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #1  
Oxnard Montalvo's Avatar
Oxnard Montalvo
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
From: 1984
Default Steel cranks

I've been primarily a Chevy man my whole life, mostly small block Corvettes.
I feel that all the manufacturers made some beautiful cars at one time or another, I'd love to own many of them. In other words I'm not **** for any specific brand.
This brings me to my question, and prefaces it so I don't sound like I'm "dissin" Fords.

Any small block Chevy worth it's salt has a forged crank and four bolt mains. I realize the high end Ford motors do, but the run of the mill performance Ford small blocks don't. Why?

Old Nov 3, 2007 | 06:10 PM
  #2  
dcohen's Avatar
dcohen
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,576
From: Salisbury NC
Default RE: Steel cranks

because the mains werent the weak point in the block

it was the webbing, and even those really arent weak

a standard 302 block will handle 400 + hp with ease
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #3  
cprstreetmachines's Avatar
cprstreetmachines
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,235
From: Socal
Default RE: Steel cranks

Yep. The blocks split long before a problem with the rotating assembly occirs. Some guys put down as much as 600+ HP on a stock bottom end, and the block goes.
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #4  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Steel cranks

Yeah, forged cranks + 4 bolt mains may have been common in some SBC's, but it's a common misconception that they were necessary for power, it was really overkill on Chevy's part. Regardless of 2 or 4 bolt, most factory blocks have the weak point in the main webbing and not the main itself. The cap and bolts that hold the mains on won't fail, but the whole main will rip off of the webbing if power is excessive or the tune is off. Also, even cast cranks are very strong, and can take more power than the block can, but what kills them is rpm. Cast iron has good compression strength, and the crank is primarily being compressed under power, hence power does kill it. But cast iron has poor tensile strength, and as the rpm increases the centrifugal force stretches the crank, and if it stretches too much it'll come apart. That's also why SFI flywheels aren't cast iron, it's not allowed because under high rpm they can come apart, so they have to be made from either forged aluminum or steel. Typically though high power comes with higher rpm, which is why most people think that cast cranks come apart under high power when it's really the rpm that's breaking it
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #5  
Oxnard Montalvo's Avatar
Oxnard Montalvo
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
From: 1984
Default RE: Steel cranks

I know this is a strength issue.

I understood the four bolts were to keep the main cap bolts from stretching under RPM which would make it easier to spin a bearing.

Are ford bearings different?
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 11:39 PM
  #6  
dcohen's Avatar
dcohen
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,576
From: Salisbury NC
Default RE: Steel cranks

you would have to be turning insane rpm to have to worry about that, just use high quality main bolts
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 01:19 AM
  #7  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default RE: Steel cranks

Yeah, if your main cap bolts are stretching under power, your bearings are the least of your concern
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #8  
Colorado_Mustang's Avatar
Colorado_Mustang
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,089
From:
Default RE: Steel cranks

The Ford mains are a bit stronger than the Chevy mains. It has to due with the block design. Plus, you're comparing the Chevy's longer stroke to the 302's 3" stroke. That will make quite a difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
svfetter
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
9
Oct 5, 2015 11:39 AM
ccdguy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
Sep 19, 2015 05:20 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 17, 2015 07:57 PM
Wombatnation
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
12
Sep 13, 2015 09:16 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
Sep 10, 2015 08:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.