Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Alignment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #21  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by Starfury
Funny that shops don't want to do it. Yes, it's a pain in the *** for 65-66's which use UCA shims, but it's also almost exactly the same as an S10. It's not really complicated, just a pain, so it usually takes a couple hours.
Some don't want to do the job because they can't just "toe-n-go" the car. I don't know if the original 60's alignment specs are even entered into the current machines' databases, but that'd be wrong for current low-profile radial tires anyway (which might scare off other shops).

I haven't read everything that MBDiagMan has written, but I've been successfully doing all of my own alignments for over 25 years. And I haven't been making the tire companies rich by doing so. Once you know what you're trying to measure, what you're trying to set the specs to (and why you want those specs), and are comfortable that your method and equipment is sufficiently accurate, the rest is just turning wrenches. Yes, you want to measure off the wheels, and you want the wheels to not be bent or dinged.

I've worked with "equipment" as low-$ as a carpenter's combination square, 6" machinist's scale, 8' tape, two lengths of string, and four jackstands. It, and other DIY measurement methods are probably not enough to make every chassis measurement that a shop's alignment rack can get, but it's enough for most practical purposes assuming that your car's chassis is reasonably "straight" to begin with.


Norm
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:27 AM
  #22  
65Coupester's Avatar
65Coupester
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 300
From: Arizona
Default

Doc,
Don't get shook up. I seldom tell people they are wrong, I just have a different preference, thats all.
The contraption is made from parts I had in my junk pile. The uprights are 3/8" stainless steel. Mild steel from Home Depot would be fine though.
The base is 3/8" steel, heavy, a bit over kill. I bent some 1.25" flat stock into a square that is a tight fit to the square tube. Then drilled a hole in it, welded a nut to the flat stock and then use a bolt as a set screw.
The uprights are attached to the base by shaft collars welded to the flat stock. There is a flat spot on the upright shaft to keep them oriented.
I set them to the width of the back of the rim first. Then remove 1 upright from the shaft collar and slide the thing under the car and around to the front.
Replace the upright and measure.
The horizontal pieces are threaded rod. They are held by threaded couplers welded to shaft collars. Locked in place with jam nuts.
If you take 2 of the horizontal rods and put them on 1 rod, and hold the rod vertically, then they can be used to measure camber off the rim using an angle finder. The only trick is to make sure the horizontal rods are the same length or you will be measuring the difference between the rods plus the camber.
I use a Dasco Pro angle finder but Harbor Freight has a digital one that measures to .1 degree. I might take a chance on that one.
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #23  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

Originally Posted by 65Coupester
. . . Harbor Freight has a digital one that measures to .1 degree. I might take a chance on that one.
That will work just fine, and it's what I use now because it's easier to read and I don't have to do the sine/cosine/tangent math any more. I attached it to a short length of angle that just spans the diameter between the lips of the flanges of the 15" wheels I have on a couple of my cars. A steel angle, so that I can stick a 9" level to the other leg to make sure that the angle finder is vertical in side view (makes a difference if it isn't vertical).

Edit - I knew I had a picture around here somewhere. If I was to build another one, I'd tap the steel angle so the screws could be cut flush. Occasionally one of the nuts doesn't quite clear a wheel spoke, which is more of a PITA than a real problem.





Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27 AM.
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #24  
fakesnakes's Avatar
fakesnakes
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,839
From: Connecticut
Default

I've followed this thread and feel I should add my 2 cents. You can make your own equipment, buy some relatively inexpensive tools, or go to an alignment shop and end up with a great alignment or a total mess. Personally, I've used this tool for many alignments at home and it works great and is very accurate:



When Jay at Vintage in Wallingford bought his alignment rack, I had my Daytona Coupe aligned there. I then tested the calibration of my equipment and it was spot on. Not bad for $150.
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #25  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

That's a pretty nifty little tool there...
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 07:38 AM
  #26  
MBDiagMan's Avatar
MBDiagMan
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 886
From: North East Texas on the Red River
Default

Originally Posted by fakesnakes
I've followed this thread and feel I should add my 2 cents. You can make your own equipment, buy some relatively inexpensive tools, or go to an alignment shop and end up with a great alignment or a total mess. Personally, I've used this tool for many alignments at home and it works great and is very accurate:



When Jay at Vintage in Wallingford bought his alignment rack, I had my Daytona Coupe aligned there. I then tested the calibration of my equipment and it was spot on. Not bad for $150.

This is turning into a great thread.

So fakesnakes, where did you get this tool? It looks worth the money.


Coupester,

Thanks for the explanation of your apparati. I have been wanting to build some sort of poormans alignment jig or two for years, but I get by with an old camber gauge and a tape measure when the need arises, and then I forget about it until the need pops up again.

Maybe you guys are inspiring me.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 08:07 AM
  #27  
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,635
From: state of confusion
Default

SmartCamber?

There's also a Smart Strings or something like that for doing toe.


Norm
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #28  
fakesnakes's Avatar
fakesnakes
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,839
From: Connecticut
Default

Most places that carry race equipment carry Fastrax, but I find Summit Racing one of the best:

http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...se&Ntt=fastrax
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #29  
MBDiagMan's Avatar
MBDiagMan
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 886
From: North East Texas on the Red River
Default

Thanks guys for the info and the link.

Upon looking at the FastTrax and the toe attachment, I found that the idea was to measure from the slot in the Fast Trax adapter arm to a point on the other side being a scribe line, a board across the sidewall(bad plan!) or to a point on the tread.

It seems to me that in order to use this properly for adjusting toe, you would need one of these on each wheel in order to get a true measurement.

The FastTrax looks like a great device for measuring caster/camber although my current gauge works good, but I like Coupesters home made gadget better for doing toe.

Thanks again.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
winner99
S197 Handling Section
3
Sep 30, 2015 07:04 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:13 AM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
Sep 29, 2015 03:31 PM
marc954
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
Sep 29, 2015 11:18 AM
lincolnshibuya
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
Sep 24, 2015 10:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.