Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

C5AE-A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #1  
crob369420's Avatar
crob369420
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 114
From: oklahoma
Default C5AE-A

can anyone tell me if my flexplate with c5ae-a stamped on it is 28oz? It has a 164 teeth
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 12:24 AM
  #2  
Randys66gt's Avatar
Randys66gt
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 441
From: California
Default

The c5 is the 1965 code but the "a" as the 3rd letter says it's a Galaxie part. Being a 164 tooth, I would imagine it's off a FE engine. The only FE that was externally balanced was the 428. I don't know if it was a 28oz. Sorry
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 05:14 AM
  #3  
kalli's Avatar
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,417
From: Cork, Ireland
Default

C5AE should be 28oz imbalance based on the year
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 05:40 AM
  #4  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Randys66gt
The c5 is the 1965 code but the "a" as the 3rd letter says it's a Galaxie part. Being a 164 tooth, I would imagine it's off a FE engine. The only FE that was externally balanced was the 428. I don't know if it was a 28oz. Sorry
Never assume something is a Galaxie part because there's an "A" in the engineering number. That only means the Galaxie group paid for the engineering of the part. Many parts installed on the Mustang carried the "A".

Oh, and lots and lots of Galaxies had 289 engines.

However, the C5AE-A 164T wheel, if intended for a 289, would indeed be a 28 oz. The change to 50 oz was decades later.

Of course, the 64-67 289 Mustang used a 157T wheel, so you either have a 68-73 Mustang, or a "parts collection".
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 06:55 AM
  #5  
kalli's Avatar
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,417
From: Cork, Ireland
Default

Hi 2+2, on that note: my flywheel was 160T (i counted 10 times as I couldn't believe it). figured that some 6 cylinder falcons used that. so the 64 models might have a few falcon leftovers :-]
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 12:44 PM
  #6  
2+2GT's Avatar
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,232
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by kalli
Hi 2+2, on that note: my flywheel was 160T (i counted 10 times as I couldn't believe it). figured that some 6 cylinder falcons used that. so the 64 models might have a few falcon leftovers :-]
True! The 157T started out as a 160T! At some point the wheel was changed to 157T, all the Service Replacements for the 160T were 157T. The diameter was unchanged, of course, I can only think each tooth was made a few thousandths thicker.
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 03:34 AM
  #7  
kalli's Avatar
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,417
From: Cork, Ireland
Default

i had two other people recount when I pulled it. couldn't believe it. thx for info
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crob369420
Classic Mustang General Discussion
6
Apr 17, 2010 02:36 PM
73Strong
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
1
Mar 9, 2008 09:56 PM
73Strong
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
0
Mar 8, 2008 08:03 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 AM.