intake and carb=cool?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 23, 2012 | 01:23 AM

#11

Starfury

6th Gear Member

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 5,896

From: Elk Grove, CA

Badass? Absolutely. Efficient? Not by a long shot. I doubt your 289 can suck enough air to justify two 4V carbs, even with progressive linkage. I'd rather spend the money on an EFI system, like rmodel said.

Mar 23, 2012 | 07:45 AM

#12

frdnut

2nd Gear Member

Joined: Nov 2010

Posts: 493

From: Ontario

It depends why you want it?..Yes it won't be the ultimate performer but set up properly it should work very well and is definetely old school cool...

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Picked up a 68 coupe, need help on intake/carb selection.

uberstang1

Classic Mustangs (Tech)

Sep 20, 2015 06:42 PM

66 Mustang Dying

Sminemann

Classic Mustangs (Tech)

Sep 17, 2015 09:24 AM

New 5.0 carb build bogs at hit of throttle

Daddys Girls GTs

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang

Sep 14, 2015 08:46 PM

Noob needs help! 86 mustang svo motor swapped to 71 5_speed carb 302 v8

jaiidutch

Motor Swap Section

Sep 14, 2015 10:29 AM

Will not fire up

Wombatnation

5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang

Sep 13, 2015 09:16 PM