Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

65 hipo heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 05:01 PM
  #1  
maprato's Avatar
maprato
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
From: michigan
Unhappy 65 hipo heads

I bought a 90 mustang and was told it had a 289 hipo motor in it from a 68. when I removed the valve covers it was stamped with a 65, so it appeares to be a 65. It also had slotted push rod holes, which would conferm it to be a early65. when I looked at the rocker arms there was no nut on the stud, but the studs appeare to be held in with roll pins. also had a 5 stamped on the outer edge of the heads. Is it just a 289 from a 65? or maybe proto type of some kind????
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
clowe1965's Avatar
clowe1965
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,287
From: South Carolina, Axle swap anyone?
Default

Pull a lifter out, it its a solid lifter then maybe. Hydraulic lifter, youve been scammed. Though i don't think hipo motors were made past 66.
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 06:18 PM
  #3  
Coupe's Avatar
Coupe
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 710
From: Indianapolis
Default

Where "289" is cast into the head between the valve springs, does it have one or two dots above the "289"? Two dots = Hipo/K code...
Old Jan 14, 2013 | 09:41 PM
  #4  
Starfury's Avatar
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,896
From: Elk Grove, CA
Default

Also, hipo valve spring seats are cupped at the bottom.
Old Jan 15, 2013 | 01:32 AM
  #5  
andrewmp6's Avatar
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,162
From:
Default

The odds are its a normal 289 a lot of people say engines are things they ain't.
Old Jan 15, 2013 | 07:16 AM
  #6  
Al Newman's Avatar
Al Newman
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 204
From: Tx
Default

How the heck did anyone take the time to get a HiPo 289 into a 1990 car and get it emissions legal? Rocker studs secured with a roll pin would be pressed in, whereas the HiPo heads would have had screw-in studs. Not likely that the motor is HiPo. Everything about the setup seems wrong. Just sayin'
Best,
Al
Old Feb 18, 2013 | 03:11 PM
  #7  
maprato's Avatar
maprato
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Coupe
Where "289" is cast into the head between the valve springs, does it have one or two dots above the "289"? Two dots = Hipo/K code...
thanks for the reply. there is only 1 dot c code
Old Feb 18, 2013 | 03:15 PM
  #8  
maprato's Avatar
maprato
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
From: michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Al Newman
How the heck did anyone take the time to get a HiPo 289 into a 1990 car and get it emissions legal? Rocker studs secured with a roll pin would be pressed in, whereas the HiPo heads would have had screw-in studs. Not likely that the motor is HiPo. Everything about the setup seems wrong. Just sayin'
Best,
Al
thanks for the reply. dont have to have an emissions test done in MI. yeah it looks like a regular 289.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
mustangheaven
Motor Swap Section
3
Jan 3, 2016 11:20 AM
kevsgt
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
Oct 9, 2015 10:12 PM
mustangheaven
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
Oct 7, 2015 10:23 AM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
Sep 30, 2015 03:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM.