General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.

5.0 vs 4.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
Ck9887's Avatar
Ck9887
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 131
From:
Default 5.0 vs 4.6

I know this has been asked but am trying to decide wehter or not I want a 94-95 GT 5.0 or a 96-97 GT 4.6.

I plant to just add a few bol t ons like intake and maybe exhaust.

I will also drag it occasionally.


Whats the pros/cons of each engine?
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
fantasyfords's Avatar
fantasyfords
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 100
From: United States
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

In my opinion I would go with the 5.0. 96 was the first year of the 4.6 so it is not the best year for that motor. Correct me if im wrong. Probably pick up a nice 94-95 for around 5-6 grand.
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #3  
VertStangGT86's Avatar
VertStangGT86
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,494
From:
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Yea, if you go with the 5.0 you'll have more/cheaper options for modding. Nothing wrong with the 4.6 but I just like the 5.0's.
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #4  
mdvaldosta's Avatar
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,826
From: United States
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Let me say something, and I dont want to offend anyone driving these cars but...

THE 1996 - 1998 MUSTANG GT'S WERE THE WORST MUSTANGS MADE SINCE THE MUSTANG II'S

Sorry for shouting
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #5  
Acer2428's Avatar
Acer2428
Site Mod
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,667
From: Oh, Hi.... Oh?
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

ummm... not really... Give the 4.6 the same time that the 5.0 has had and the 96-98's will have their day. Hell, an intake upgrade from livernois will put you at the same levels as a PI headswap w/ a better looking body (opinion of course)
Old May 17, 2004 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
mdvaldosta's Avatar
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,826
From: United States
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Never said they can't be helped, just basically that you if you get one your starting with a severe disadvantage.
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #7  
roundman's Avatar
roundman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,813
From:
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

I'd go with a 5.0 model as there are many more mods available and they are easier to work on than the overhead cam 4.6. also there is no replacement for displacement!
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #8  
VertStangGT86's Avatar
VertStangGT86
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,494
From:
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

He also said 96-98's not the 4.6 in general. The post 98 4.6's were a lot better.
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #9  
Ck9887's Avatar
Ck9887
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 131
From:
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

How is the reliability on the 5.0's compared to the 4.6?

stock vs stock, which one turns better times at the drag strip? And also, does the different engine cuase any difference in handling?


thanks for all the replies so far
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #10  
USAMuscle's Avatar
USAMuscle
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,404
From: United States
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

ORIGINAL: mdvaldosta

Never said they can't be helped, just basically that you if you get one your starting with a severe disadvantage.
True, but they can be had for a lot less $$$ than a newer GT, and you could spend the money saved on a PI head and intake swap and some other mods and walk all over the newer GT's (stock). I personally like the body style better, especially the '96-'98 Saleen models, than the newer body style. It's possible to come out way ahead with a '96-'98 GT for the same amount of money. Anyway, it's all about Mustangs though, and that's what's important.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.