General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

5.0 vs 4.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2004, 04:00 PM
  #31  
Birdieman4
5th Gear Member
 
Birdieman4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,020
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

Like I said, Im not as much interested in Modding the car, I may not even mod anything at all...So im looking for the car thats better completely stock, not which one has the potential to be better.
Completely stock, without consideration for mods, the better engine is the 4.6(hopefully a 99+). As far as stock engines go, the 4.6 modular is a much more efficient power plant. This engine is way happier at rpms than the 5.0 ever was stock. I agree, when $ is a factor for modding and repairs, the 5.0 is the better value(at least right now). Engine to engine,stock to stock, the 99+ 4.6's are a LOT better engines and a lot happier engines at rpm. I have had a lot of experience with both motors.
________________
02 S281E Saleen
Birdieman4 is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 06:54 PM
  #32  
DUB 6
I ♥ Acer
 
DUB 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 990
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

ORIGINAL: Ck9887

I know this has been asked but am trying to decide wehter or not I want a 94-95 GT 5.0 or a 96-97 GT 4.6.

I plant to just add a few bol t ons like intake and maybe exhaust.

I will also drag it occasionally.


Whats the pros/cons of each engine?
Go with the 5.0 my friend....It's much more reliable 96-98 stang produce a little bit more power..but you can get alot more mods with the 5.0 than the 4.6.
DUB 6 is offline  
Old 05-22-2004, 02:26 AM
  #33  
callmecobra
5th Gear Member
 
callmecobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,883
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

ORIGINAL: DUB 6
Go with the 5.0 my friend....It's much more reliable
wow...not true at all
callmecobra is offline  
Old 05-22-2004, 02:32 AM
  #34  
VertStangGT86
4th Gear Member
 
VertStangGT86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,494
Default RE: 5.0 vs 4.6

The more you add into a system the more can go wrong, 5.0's are simpler. You also can't look at how many people have problems with a new 4.6 compared to a 5.0 cause chances are the 5.0's got higher miles and is certainly older. If you had a 4.6 and 5.0 with the same miles in the same condition I doubt there would be any real differance in reliability. Also people seem to forget money is always a factor. If you have, say 10,000 to spend on a car you can get a fox in much better condition for that then you could get a new one.
VertStangGT86 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustang0291
5.0L General Discussion
6
10-12-2015 07:55 AM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM



Quick Reply: 5.0 vs 4.6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.