Quick Question
#11
RE: Quick Question
ORIGINAL: Li0nHart
Yeah the foxes are small. I am 6' 2" and I sometimes find the headroom to be a bit tight but he leg room is fine as the seats are pretty far back as compared to other cars fo the same size. Remember, the back seats of the foxes are barely useable as the front seat is so far back.
Yeah the foxes are small. I am 6' 2" and I sometimes find the headroom to be a bit tight but he leg room is fine as the seats are pretty far back as compared to other cars fo the same size. Remember, the back seats of the foxes are barely useable as the front seat is so far back.
#14
RE: Quick Question
4.6 have more power to begin with but if you build a 5.0 right it will kick *** all day long. That and you can buy everything under the sun for a 5.0. And if you want a newer motor you can order a 345hp 302 from Summit and just drop it in your 94-95 Mustang.
BTW The 345hp motor is only like $3000 shipped. WOOOT
BTW The 345hp motor is only like $3000 shipped. WOOOT
#15
RE: Quick Question
If you're looking into a 94-98, I would recommend a 94 or 95 GT, just because they still have the 5.0 motors. The non pi (96-97) 4.6 motors were horribly underpowered and took a lot of money just to get them up to the same power level of the 99-04 motors. Also the 5.0 motor will be MUCH cheaper to upgrade and will respond better than the 4.6.
Correct me if im wrong, but I thought the body was the same on all 94-98 mustangs. I wasnt aware about any tail light or body differences.
Correct me if im wrong, but I thought the body was the same on all 94-98 mustangs. I wasnt aware about any tail light or body differences.
#17
RE: Quick Question
def go 94-95 bc 96-98 are slower in stock form believe me i raced stock v. stock time and time again and never lost once. PLus more torque= more fun and the 5.0s are easier to mod dont even bother with a 4.6 unless its 99 up
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM