The back seat in foxes and sn95s are the same size. Also the waterfall dash on sn95s hits my knees. (Im 6'2")

 

Does anyone know why the 1996 is the lightest of the models between 1994 - 1998?

 

If it is it's not much imo. Probably 10-20lbs. just a guess

 

4.6 have more power to begin with but if you build a 5.0 right it will kick *** all day long. That and you can buy everything under the sun for a 5.0. And if you want a newer motor you can order a 345hp 302 from Summit and just drop it in your 94-95 Mustang.

BTW The 345hp motor is only like $3000 shipped. WOOOT

 

If you're looking into a 94-98, I would recommend a 94 or 95 GT, just because they still have the 5.0 motors. The non pi (96-97) 4.6 motors were horribly underpowered and took a lot of money just to get them up to the same power level of the 99-04 motors. Also the 5.0 motor will be MUCH cheaper to upgrade and will respond better than the 4.6.

Correct me if im wrong, but I thought the body was the same on all 94-98 mustangs. I wasnt aware about any tail light or body differences.

 

Tail lights definitely changed. They started out as those horizontal bars...[:'(]

 

def go 94-95 bc 96-98 are slower in stock form believe me i raced stock v. stock time and time again and never lost once. PLus more torque= more fun and the 5.0s are easier to mod dont even bother with a 4.6 unless its 99 up