General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Quick Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2007, 07:10 PM
  #11  
threeg502
1st Gear Member
 
threeg502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 126
Default RE: Quick Question

ORIGINAL: Li0nHart

Yeah the foxes are small. I am 6' 2" and I sometimes find the headroom to be a bit tight but he leg room is fine as the seats are pretty far back as compared to other cars fo the same size. Remember, the back seats of the foxes are barely useable as the front seat is so far back.
The back seat in foxes and sn95s are the same size. Also the waterfall dash on sn95s hits my knees. (Im 6'2")
threeg502 is offline  
Old 01-21-2007, 07:20 PM
  #12  
Supercrewzin01
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Supercrewzin01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 54
Default RE: Quick Question

Does anyone know why the 1996 is the lightest of the models between 1994 - 1998?


Supercrewzin01 is offline  
Old 01-21-2007, 07:42 PM
  #13  
threeg502
1st Gear Member
 
threeg502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 126
Default RE: Quick Question

If it is it's not much imo. Probably 10-20lbs. just a guess
threeg502 is offline  
Old 01-21-2007, 09:15 PM
  #14  
Wakes4Fun
 
Wakes4Fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 5
Default RE: Quick Question

4.6 have more power to begin with but if you build a 5.0 right it will kick *** all day long. That and you can buy everything under the sun for a 5.0. And if you want a newer motor you can order a 345hp 302 from Summit and just drop it in your 94-95 Mustang.

BTW The 345hp motor is only like $3000 shipped. WOOOT
Wakes4Fun is offline  
Old 01-21-2007, 09:49 PM
  #15  
hotrod7687
3rd Gear Member
 
hotrod7687's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 721
Default RE: Quick Question

If you're looking into a 94-98, I would recommend a 94 or 95 GT, just because they still have the 5.0 motors. The non pi (96-97) 4.6 motors were horribly underpowered and took a lot of money just to get them up to the same power level of the 99-04 motors. Also the 5.0 motor will be MUCH cheaper to upgrade and will respond better than the 4.6.

Correct me if im wrong, but I thought the body was the same on all 94-98 mustangs. I wasnt aware about any tail light or body differences.
hotrod7687 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 02:58 AM
  #16  
Colorado_Mustang
5th Gear Member
 
Colorado_Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,089
Default RE: Quick Question

Tail lights definitely changed. They started out as those horizontal bars...[:'(]
Colorado_Mustang is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:00 AM
  #17  
94TealGT
2nd Gear Member
 
94TealGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 222
Default RE: Quick Question

def go 94-95 bc 96-98 are slower in stock form believe me i raced stock v. stock time and time again and never lost once. PLus more torque= more fun and the 5.0s are easier to mod dont even bother with a 4.6 unless its 99 up
94TealGT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tmdm
Detailing
10
05-02-2021 02:49 PM
svfetter
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
9
10-05-2015 11:39 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
Big Al's 03
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
09-15-2015 09:05 AM
Mustangmalo
General Tech
2
09-06-2015 05:22 PM



Quick Reply: Quick Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.