Corvette in need for Mustang help!
#1
Corvette in need for Mustang help!
Hi all
Though I haven't had a Mustang for years I turn to this forum for help.
I have a 68 Corvette Convertible with a slight modified 350 engine with manual transmission.
Problem is: With a 3,70 rear and a Muncie 21 close ratio, first 2,20 the gears are to deep for a proper launch.
Further I wouldn't mind to lower the engine RPM for a more comfortable mainroad/highway cruise. So I strongly consider to swap with a T5 WC.
I understand that the T5 WC for 90-93 cobra's are reinforced for a higher torque (310 or 330 ft./lbs)?
If I'm correct they are available with a first gear ratio of 2,94?
Do these boxes have a mechanical speedo drive?
Could someone share their experience with the longivity of these boxes?
Someone who knows where I can find a box including a shaft yoke?
Your comments are much appreciated.
Thanks
Lars
Though I haven't had a Mustang for years I turn to this forum for help.
I have a 68 Corvette Convertible with a slight modified 350 engine with manual transmission.
Problem is: With a 3,70 rear and a Muncie 21 close ratio, first 2,20 the gears are to deep for a proper launch.
Further I wouldn't mind to lower the engine RPM for a more comfortable mainroad/highway cruise. So I strongly consider to swap with a T5 WC.
I understand that the T5 WC for 90-93 cobra's are reinforced for a higher torque (310 or 330 ft./lbs)?
If I'm correct they are available with a first gear ratio of 2,94?
Do these boxes have a mechanical speedo drive?
Could someone share their experience with the longivity of these boxes?
Someone who knows where I can find a box including a shaft yoke?
Your comments are much appreciated.
Thanks
Lars
#4
Thanks for your reply.
The reason that I turned to this forum, as well as considering a box from a Ford, is that I understand that a WC box from a Mustang Cobra is stronger than the T5's from GM.
I don't want to go for a 6 speed as this requires modification to the tunnel.
The said WC box from Cobra's also has a first gear ratio of 2.95 which I believe match's my 3,70 rear end.
Thanks
Lars
The reason that I turned to this forum, as well as considering a box from a Ford, is that I understand that a WC box from a Mustang Cobra is stronger than the T5's from GM.
I don't want to go for a 6 speed as this requires modification to the tunnel.
The said WC box from Cobra's also has a first gear ratio of 2.95 which I believe match's my 3,70 rear end.
Thanks
Lars
#6
T5 are not the best trans for anything with real torque (302 will hurt a WC T5) a 350 Chevy will really put the hurt to a WC T5 unless you get one from the aftermarket that has been worked to handle power. By the time you spend the cash to get a T5 that can take abuse a TKO 600 is at the same cost, go to the TKO and they can be bought in GM input shaft and bolt pattern (something any Cobra T5 will not). I think you mean that the gearing in your Vette is too tall not too low, if it is too low then the 2.97 in the TKO/T5 will be worse in the case of too low. An M21 with 3.73 in a Vette is a good combination and is common to the 60 muscle cars, it should drive just fine. Another option if you want a deeper first gear is to find yourself a M20 (2.52 1st) wide ratio transmission and it will bolt in just like stock. There is currently a company building M22 with the M20 ratio so that is an option too. Forget the T5 you'll be sorry in the long run.
My Chevelle has a TKO600 behind a 350, and currently 3.08, it is a dream to drive and will be even better once the 3.31's get into it.
My Chevelle has a TKO600 behind a 350, and currently 3.08, it is a dream to drive and will be even better once the 3.31's get into it.
#7
Thanks for valuable replies.
The T5 is in my favour due to the size which makes it a relative easy fit in a C3 Corvette, as well as the very smooth shift compared to a Tremec, which also requires more modification an already tight trans tunnel..
I will fabricate an adaptor plate to fit the box to the original GM bell housing.
Kiesler makes modified T5 that can handle up to 600 lb-ft. However, I’m aware that this is not a stock Mustang version.
I have the 90-93 WC T5 that’s specified to handle 310-330 lb-ft in my mind. The car is for street driving in summer time only, not for hard racing. However, I expect my 350 to put out close to 400 lb-ft!
What is your experiences with these boxes when the torque limit is exceeded?
Further, do you know where they brake. (Weak point)
Your inputs a greatly appreciated.
Lars
The T5 is in my favour due to the size which makes it a relative easy fit in a C3 Corvette, as well as the very smooth shift compared to a Tremec, which also requires more modification an already tight trans tunnel..
I will fabricate an adaptor plate to fit the box to the original GM bell housing.
Kiesler makes modified T5 that can handle up to 600 lb-ft. However, I’m aware that this is not a stock Mustang version.
I have the 90-93 WC T5 that’s specified to handle 310-330 lb-ft in my mind. The car is for street driving in summer time only, not for hard racing. However, I expect my 350 to put out close to 400 lb-ft!
What is your experiences with these boxes when the torque limit is exceeded?
Further, do you know where they brake. (Weak point)
Your inputs a greatly appreciated.
Lars
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
5
11-09-2016 11:45 AM
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
3
03-18-2016 11:21 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
8
01-06-2016 07:03 PM