wahoo
07-31-2005, 11:23 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 4
wahoo
I don't have a stang yet but i will.I need some help picking a year.I like the 94 or 95 becouse i like the body styles and i like the fact of the 5.0.I have ?'s before i buy.I am a ford man and always will be.I own a eddie baur explorer 2000 with the 5.0.
Is the 5.0 better than the 4.6.I hear that the 4.6 is a bad idea becouse of limeted mods.Please help me decide.My bro has the fox body stang.I forgot the year of his.I know what ever i get iwant it to beet his on the track and the street.He has a dyno test of 425 rwhp and 405 fpt.I need to beet him with the stang i get.I have time to decide and want the best info for my decision.Please help.
07-31-2005, 10:43 PM
#3
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,957
RE: wahoo
personaly, i dont like the look of the fox body stang, but its ur car so have fun wiht it!
the 5.0 engine isnt used anymore for a reason though, and you havta take that into consideration
there are definatly more (cheaper) mods for the fox body stang then the 4.6, but the
4.6 has its fair share of an aftermarket, so dont be shy on that regard
wut ever you choose, im sure you will b happy and good luck!
the 5.0 engine isnt used anymore for a reason though, and you havta take that into consideration
there are definatly more (cheaper) mods for the fox body stang then the 4.6, but the
4.6 has its fair share of an aftermarket, so dont be shy on that regard
wut ever you choose, im sure you will b happy and good luck!
07-31-2005, 10:52 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: wahoo
^^ The 94 isn't a foxbody, 93 was the last year of the foxes. The 94 and 95 GT's have the same look as a 1998 stang, but witha 5.0
From a professional standpoint (i work on cars) The 5.0 is a much stronger engine than the 4.6. The 4.6 isn't bad, I'm just comparing. They're more durable, and can hold a ****load of power. Not to mention all the mods that are offered. I say get a 94-95...you get the 5.0 and the nicer body style. It's a win win situation.
From a professional standpoint (i work on cars) The 5.0 is a much stronger engine than the 4.6. The 4.6 isn't bad, I'm just comparing. They're more durable, and can hold a ****load of power. Not to mention all the mods that are offered. I say get a 94-95...you get the 5.0 and the nicer body style. It's a win win situation.
08-06-2005, 12:36 PM
#6
Pro. B.S. caller outer
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
RE: wahoo
There are not that many 94/95 cars around, only being made for two years. For a 10 year old car anything under 1000k miles is great but hard to find. I have a 94 Gt 5 speed with 94000 miles that I will sell for $6000, It's all stock and in very good shape.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post