General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.

OHV?

Old Aug 11, 2005 | 11:31 PM
  #11  
Magiarn71's Avatar
Magiarn71
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 646
From:
Default RE: OHV?

I know that. But as far as referring to the types, its not usually stated "DOHC SOHC and pushrod" They just use OHV and you know its a pushrod motor because theres no C in it.
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #12  
JD1969's Avatar
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,644
From: IL
Default RE: OHV?


ORIGINAL: 2000Si


ORIGINAL: GreyStang


ORIGINAL: 2000Si


ORIGINAL: NewMexMustang

Are pushrods good...disadvantages?
good = creates more torque

bad = not as breathable in the top end of the power band.
Why would the existence of pushrods create more torque?

Bottom line an cam-in-block or cam-in-head engine is gonna behave pretty much the same way. But the advantage of cam-in-head is there is less complexity, and less pieces. So they can rev much higher without risk of valve float.
It's more in the design of the engine actually. Pushrods are just the usual design in torquey engines.

Low velocity air creates more torque. Pushrods have a horrible top end, usually redling around 5500ish. That puts their torque band from near idle to a few thousand RPMs. Look up the specs on the Viper engines. the SRT10 makes 525 ft lbs somewhere around 1700 rpm.

magiarn: ALL DOHC/SOHC engines are OHV. OHV simply means that the valves are overhead of the engine block. But since SOHC/DOHC are named accordingly, pushrods have been known to be called OHVs since there's only one cam and it sits inside the engine block and not in the head(s) itself/themselves.
Well I think you are right on some things but off alittle on the pushrod motors ability to rev. High rpm hp is more a factor of cam specs and valve train stability/geometry, and head flow numbers. Now a cam-in-head motor will rev higher, without a doubt, but pushrod motors can be made to rev and make power realitivly high in the rpm range. Example my LS1, I shift it at 7000 rpm, because of the cam/valve springs and push rods I use I can do that, and the fact that the LS1 heads flow very very well. My old 355 is another good example, it was a solid roller cam that I would shift at 7400 rpm. Now when compareing stock for stock then yes generally the SOHC or DOHC motor will make more power higher in the rpm range, but one of the major disadvantages of the SOCH 4.6 motor is the way the heads had be designed. In order to fit the motor in the Mustang and put the cam in the head Ford had to make the port runners take some pretty sharp turns which of course hurts air flow, and thus make less power. This is one reason that the 4.6 motors respond so well to boost, the boost masks a problem in the design of the cylinder head.

As for the OHV thing, I would say both definitions are correct, mine being a somwhat older one (but then again I am old).
Old Aug 12, 2005 | 09:07 PM
  #13  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: OHV?

I was basing most of what I was talking about on mid 90s OHV engines. The 5.0, and LT1s persay. Of course technology will allow increases in revs and a broader power band. I apologize, I thought my first line was explanatory, and then with my paragraph I generalized older, more popular OHV engines.
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #14  
JD1969's Avatar
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,644
From: IL
Default RE: OHV?

No worries James, it allowed me to write my book.
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #15  
OneGearhead's Avatar
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,867
From: VA
Default RE: OHV?

OHV=cam in the block. one cam for both heads, having pushrods/lifters instead of lifters and followers(which sohc and dohc have)

SOHC/DOHC= one or two cams per head. sohc will have one cam operating both intake and exhaust valves. while dohc has one cam for intake, and one cam for exhaust.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RED2000
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
7
Jul 21, 2008 09:29 PM
jdavis
4.6L General Discussion
23
Jul 27, 2007 12:29 PM
james123
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Mar 24, 2007 09:57 PM
mustangjohn
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
3
Feb 3, 2007 02:20 PM
2pac4life
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
Nov 28, 2006 11:49 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.