1/4, 0-60???
#12
RE: 1/4, 0-60???
ORIGINAL: Sleeper05
except for the common knowledge that magazine times SUCK because they have no feel for the cars they test. while what you say is true in some cases, and they do usually test in optimum whether conditions, "factory freaks" and "first run" cars are by no means common industry practices
ORIGINAL: averyr18
Well 3 things come in to play here.... The guys at the road and track, car and driver, motor trend etc. Test their vehicles under optimum driving conditions. They also have quite a bit of experience with getting the best luanch in the 1/4 mile. The third thing is that car companies send cars that are a little better tuned than the production models. Thus for giving you (the reader) a false idea of how well it performs.
ORIGINAL: johnnyv8
thats cool, road and track said a 0-60 of 4.9 sec, that sound a little faster then i though..what do you guys think?
thats cool, road and track said a 0-60 of 4.9 sec, that sound a little faster then i though..what do you guys think?
#13
RE: 1/4, 0-60???
"is true in some cases..."factory freaks"...are (not) common industry practices "
i said it happens, but not usually, especially in the information age where someone buys a product expecting it to be like advertised
i said it happens, but not usually, especially in the information age where someone buys a product expecting it to be like advertised
#14
RE: 1/4, 0-60???
ORIGINAL: Sleeper05
"is true in some cases..."factory freaks"...are (not) common industry practices "
i said it happens, but not usually, especially in the information age where someone buys a product expecting it to be like advertised
"is true in some cases..."factory freaks"...are (not) common industry practices "
i said it happens, but not usually, especially in the information age where someone buys a product expecting it to be like advertised
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post