300RWHP - Page 2 - MustangForums.com

Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

300RWHP

Reply

 
 
 
Old 10-05-2006, 06:08 PM
  #11  
flounderlipps
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Confusion
Posts: 244
Default RE: 300RWHP

My car dynoed 280 to the wheels
Bone stock
right off the show room floor
flounderlipps is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 01:14 PM
  #12  
Riven02
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,095
Default RE: 300RWHP

I know this is a little off topic and I do not mean it to start a thread about which is faster. It seems that most think a z28 is slightly faster than our mustangs stock and in a race they should win.

What RWHP do we have to make to put us in the should win catagory, I dont mean just make it a drivers race I would like to know what would make us win 4-5 times with close drivers. I beleive they make about 310 RWHP but I think they are heavier aswell and thier gearing is pretty high. SOOO I was thinking 300 should give a mustang a slight advantage in a 1/4 mile. Disagree? I know some of you guys have both, and my Chevy knowlege is lacking.

The goal for my car is to just be faster than most sports cars on the road, and I cant live with a stock comaro being faster.
Riven02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 05:49 PM
  #13  
BLackie
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 262
Default RE: 300RWHP

know this is a little off topic and I do not mean it to start a thread about which is faster. It seems that most think a z28 is slightly faster than our mustangs stock and in a race they should win.

What RWHP do we have to make to put us in the should win catagory, I dont mean just make it a drivers race I would like to know what would make us win 4-5 times with close drivers. I beleive they make about 310 RWHP but I think they are heavier aswell and thier gearing is pretty high. SOOO I was thinking 300 should give a mustang a slight advantage in a 1/4 mile. Disagree? I know some of you guys have both, and my Chevy knowlege is lacking.

The goal for my car is to just be faster than most sports cars on the road, and I cant live with a stock comaro being faster.
That needs its own forum
BLackie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 07:45 PM
  #14  
Riven02
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,095
Default RE: 300RWHP

Well the reason I went ahead and posted here is 1) everyone always seems to shoot for 300... Seems there must be something to it, and 2) If i start a new thread called Comaro Compare I will get an entire thread of people argueing which is faster..... I was hoping just to catch someone that has both or atleast has owned both.

Riven02 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91lx50udlose
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
31
03-11-2009 12:05 PM
CroDalmatinac
V6 S197 General Discussion
5
02-18-2008 11:55 AM
Stang9946
General Tech
5
08-11-2007 07:42 PM
sipynsyrup
Street/Strip
61
03-30-2007 02:44 PM
NORTON98
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
24
06-09-2006 06:44 PM

Forum Jump

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory