GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

UDP Vs. CMCV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2007 | 01:41 AM
  #11  
MexGT's Avatar
MexGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,206
From: Tampico, Mexico
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

I would do the cams as my last option. I would definetelly get 3.73´s or 4.10´s if i'm getting CMDP´s.
Headers is a real good option too ! LT´s ofcourse.... I would definetelly get em.
Pulleys are good, I like my Steedas
Old May 9, 2007 | 01:47 AM
  #12  
drbobvs's Avatar
drbobvs
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,031
From: Babylon, NY
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

+1 on the UDP's, I don't like the delete plates. Have not seen anyone post a decent gain and if there was a gain, there was power lost down low.
Old May 9, 2007 | 03:53 AM
  #13  
androdz's Avatar
androdz
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,090
From:
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

ORIGINAL: MexGT

I would do the cams as my last option. I would definetelly get 3.73´s or 4.10´s if i'm getting CMDP´s.
Headers is a real good option too ! LT´s ofcourse.... I would definetelly get em.
Pulleys are good, I like my Steedas
Cams are a complete waste of money on our cars.

Andrew
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #14  
wcgman's Avatar
wcgman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,652
From: Colorado
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

And lt's are what?

I havent heard of any gains with deletes but udp's have always been an easy way to free up a few extra horses.
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #15  
rick98gt's Avatar
rick98gt
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 128
From:
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

I can tell you first hand the plates are a worth while mod.I have a B A M A tune with my plates and the car pulls deep into the 6,000rpm range.I never run my car that hard because they start to lose power ,but it never stopped pulling.I lost nothing down low and throttle response is the same ,if not better with the plates.s a side note the pullies were a snap to install and you will notice your car rev faster..
Old May 9, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #16  
wcgman's Avatar
wcgman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,652
From: Colorado
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

ORIGINAL: rick98gt

I can tell you first hand the plates are a worth while mod.I have a B A M A tune with my plates and the car pulls deep into the 6,000rpm range.I never run my car that hard because they start to lose power ,but it never stopped pulling.I lost nothing down low and throttle response is the same ,if not better with the plates.s a side note the pullies were a snap to install and you will notice your car rev faster..
Really? This is one of the first times I've heard that. Anybody else have the same experience? How hard are the plate installs?
Old May 9, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #17  
gtrichyo6's Avatar
gtrichyo6
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 290
From:
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

I added the delete plates and B A M A tune and didn't lose any power down low.Car pulls like a bat out of hell.
Old May 9, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #18  
howarmat's Avatar
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,088
From: IN
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

Many people have install them and all report good.....i dont know how you have missed all the posts....
Old May 9, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #19  
MexGT's Avatar
MexGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,206
From: Tampico, Mexico
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

Seems that i'll have to save some money for the CMDP´s
Old May 9, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #20  
probinator's Avatar
probinator
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 914
From:
Default RE: UDP Vs. CMCV

I did the delete plates and gained power throughout the powerband. I would reccomend that and the udp at the same time. Gears would probably make a bigger difference then those two combined though.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 AM.