340 RWHP N/A
11-16-2007, 07:25 PM
#41
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,090
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V
Yea thats hilarious...considering its been done doesnt seem to crazy to me...
ORIGINAL: androdz
What you talking about?? Heads and Cams hp's dont add up on each others. It is the same as pulleys and a electric water pump. Each will give you 9 hp or so if you do either one. But if you do both you get like 11-12 hp. Same with cams. Dont believe everything a person that is trying to sell you something says.
ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V
With ported heads, Stage II cams (BBR), Delete Plates, Underdrive Pullies, CAI, dynotune, midpipe, and Longtubes you can almost get 400rwhp N/A
With ported heads, Stage II cams (BBR), Delete Plates, Underdrive Pullies, CAI, dynotune, midpipe, and Longtubes you can almost get 400rwhp N/A
Andrew
11-16-2007, 07:47 PM
#42
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,333
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: KTownGT
You talking about CAM's like the Crower Custom grinds or what?
I would say 380 RWHP would be the highest safest amount of HP you would run with H/C + Full bolt-ons.
The BBR stang that made 400ish RWHP was not street legal and was running a very dangerous tune.
ORIGINAL: AmericanMuscle4.6GT
now that more developed products such as better cams and boltons are coming out, its really not hard to get to 350 RWHP n/a.
now that more developed products such as better cams and boltons are coming out, its really not hard to get to 350 RWHP n/a.
I would say 380 RWHP would be the highest safest amount of HP you would run with H/C + Full bolt-ons.
The BBR stang that made 400ish RWHP was not street legal and was running a very dangerous tune.
11-17-2007, 01:38 AM
#43
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 186
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: Rench
Yeah, I wonder about that myself. Most likely the TB with the spacer plate. It still seems a little low for what the car feels like seat of the pants and the way it jams out of the hole (1.68 60's) doesn't really add up. I have never really been a big fan of dyno numbers and depend on track numbers more for mod results.
Yeah, I wonder about that myself. Most likely the TB with the spacer plate. It still seems a little low for what the car feels like seat of the pants and the way it jams out of the hole (1.68 60's) doesn't really add up. I have never really been a big fan of dyno numbers and depend on track numbers more for mod results.
how reliable is your car witt those mods?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
0
09-17-2015 07:32 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-16-2015 07:53 PM
