Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
#2
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
I'm thinking about checking into this. Though they do say the test was used with 93 octane, which means they also tuned it for 93 octane. So it might be less for the 87 octane and tune. Anyway, they are about an hour and a half maybe away from me... so when I'm ready to purchase my intake & tuner I might take a ride over there, they claim you also get two free dyno's... so maybe that'll be proof? We'll see!
#3
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
I've seen this too, and I'm skeptical, but if Menace is close to them I would really appreciate any feedback you have. Their claims are for the 93 octane tune, and the lower octane tunes would definitely produce less power. But even so, these are some great gains that are allegedly backed up by a Mustang Dyno (which typically display lower results than you get from Dynojets).
Keep us in the loop Menace.
Best,
-j
Keep us in the loop Menace.
Best,
-j
#4
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
I'll try to, though it may not be for a while. So don't hold your breath please! I could of course go there with my income tax check and get it, but... There is this concept of saving money for other things, and currently that's what I'm doing. :T So yeah, the Mustang is unfortunately on the back burner of things to spend my funding on.
#5
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
You will receive Two Free Dyno Pulls at are location
are location?
oops
Wonder what else they put in the tune as far as autos and how they shift, and throttle lag.
Id stick with a well known tuner like brenspeed or bamachips.
are location?
oops
Wonder what else they put in the tune as far as autos and how they shift, and throttle lag.
Id stick with a well known tuner like brenspeed or bamachips.
#6
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
The factory tune is set mostly for safety of the engine on less than premium gas. Adding a less restrictive MAF Meter and tuning it on 93 octane allows you to get that much closer to the point of detonation. When I had my Cobra tuned, I picked up 20 RWHP when he changed the A/F ratio by .5. Therefore, I am inclined to believe that if you pull out the safety margins ford builds into the cars and tune it for a higher grade of fuel, you can probably get 48RWHP... besides, what do you have to lose? SCT and C&L are well known names in the performance industry (I have both a C&L and was tuned by SCT). Of course, the downside is that you will always be filling up with 93 octane or better fuel... which can get pricey.
#7
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
I have C&L, with Brenspeed tunes. He, Bamachips, and the other guy(Alternative Auto?) are the main 3 to do quality tunes and none of them claim over 30RWHP so I call BS. Average I've seen is about 25RWHP gain with this setup on 89+ ocatanes.
#9
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
stock HP looked kinda low didnt it? if stock with proper tune can get near 300, they only gained about 25...just guessin...
#10
RE: Company Claining +48 RWHP and +24 RWTQ with intake and tune only, dyno sheets as well.....
ORIGINAL: ford4v429
stock HP looked kinda low didnt it? if stock with proper tune can get near 300, they only gained about 25...just guessin...
stock HP looked kinda low didnt it? if stock with proper tune can get near 300, they only gained about 25...just guessin...
Those numbers looked right for numbers on a dyno jet, a mustang dyno reads lower. These numbers would translate to about 290 whp and 320 ft tq on a dyno jet which is too high.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-01-2015 08:16 PM