Mach 1 Engine Questions
for racing go with the auto. It is only 2-3 tenths slower from everything I've seen at the track and responds well as hell to a set of 4.10s and descent rubber...to the tune of a high 12. Any stock auto by any make will take track abuse for only so long, but the stock one is a descent one and won't break in a short amount of time.
for racing go with the auto. It is only 2-3 tenths slower from everything I've seen at the track and responds well as hell to a set of 4.10s and descent rubber...to the tune of a high 12. Any stock auto by any make will take track abuse for only so long, but the stock one is a descent one and won't break in a short amount of time.
Just depends on what the OP really wants, because performance wise they're both pretty much the same. Even if you go high end, a big dollar borg-warner forged slush box isn't going to shift any faster or any better than a guy that's quick on the stick with a viper-spec T56.. That's just me though.
It'll hold it, just not as long as it'll hold up to a stock setting. Just wears the trans out faster basically. Depends too on how often you run it hard, etc. Adding DRs or slicks will shorten the life of the trans further, of course. I've never had any stock trans hold up very long once I started stalling, bumping up shift points, supercharging, etc. I plan on pushing my rev limit up by 4-500 rpms, adjusting the shift points by mph, and leaving the shift pressure itself alone. The auto machs already shift very hard. Anymore will just result in spinning/lower ETs.
+1 to what Sub posted.
Any stock tranny will break if you give it enough abuse on the track. The thing about the auto's is that they're just plain easier to launch. BUT, the deal with auto's is that it takes a little more work on the tune to get the shift points right, because as Stonie pointed out, a stock auto with a 6800rpm shift point in 2nd WOULD be all over the road. When you start modding, it's still going to come down to driver mod, especially with a stall. I'll agree with Rygi that the autos do respond well to gears, LCA's and tires. Just my point of view, but it comes down to driver preference and what the driver is good at. Some people just can never get the handle of feathering the clutch and throttle at the same time off the line, and for those guys an auto would work better because it's a little simpler. Some guys are better at working the stick in a manual.
Just depends on what the OP really wants, because performance wise they're both pretty much the same. Even if you go high end, a big dollar borg-warner forged slush box isn't going to shift any faster or any better than a guy that's quick on the stick with a viper-spec T56.. That's just me though.
Just depends on what the OP really wants, because performance wise they're both pretty much the same. Even if you go high end, a big dollar borg-warner forged slush box isn't going to shift any faster or any better than a guy that's quick on the stick with a viper-spec T56.. That's just me though.
It'll hold it, just not as long as it'll hold up to a stock setting. Just wears the trans out faster basically. Depends too on how often you run it hard, etc. Adding DRs or slicks will shorten the life of the trans further, of course. I've never had any stock trans hold up very long once I started stalling, bumping up shift points, supercharging, etc. I plan on pushing my rev limit up by 4-500 rpms, adjusting the shift points by mph, and leaving the shift pressure itself alone. The auto machs already shift very hard. Anymore will just result in spinning/lower ETs.
+1 to what Sub posted.
+1 to what Sub posted.
.
Thanks for all the info guys. From reading I'm pretty sure the auto in these cars are stronger then the 4l60e found in the ls1 f-body's. My friend has a stalled one with stock transmission and it's been runnig strong for 2 years at the track. I think that gives me new hope when looking at these transmissions.
Does anyone know why Ford used a non-forged crank in the autos? Seems really weird.
Does anyone know why Ford used a non-forged crank in the autos? Seems really weird.
Thanks for all the info guys. From reading I'm pretty sure the auto in these cars are stronger then the 4l60e found in the ls1 f-body's. My friend has a stalled one with stock transmission and it's been runnig strong for 2 years at the track. I think that gives me new hope when looking at these transmissions.
Does anyone know why Ford used a non-forged crank in the autos? Seems really weird.
Does anyone know why Ford used a non-forged crank in the autos? Seems really weird.
Actually, it was a mechanical shortcoming. The auto tranny flexplate would only bolt up to the 6 bolt cast iron crankshaft used in the 2v 4.6 vs the manual transmissions 8 bolt flywheel which would bolt up to the steel forged 8 bolt cranshaft. Evidently Ford felt it would be too expensive to make up a new flexplate given the fewer number of cars ordered with the auto trans, plus it was a limited edition run cars anyway.
Last edited by Mach1man; Jan 18, 2009 at 08:42 PM.


