Oil and Oil Related Topics A place to post your oil related questions and comments

oil question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2010, 11:03 PM
  #31  
2k05gt
4th Gear Member
 
2k05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,249
Default

I just want to point out that Oil filters are more important than the oil, if you don't have clean oil what the use of buying expensive synthetics?

Many newer Fords specify a Motorcraft FL820S Oil Filter for the engine. Is this the best filter for the job?? Inquiring minds want to know (or at least I do).

Group 1 (My personal favorites)

Ford Racing CM-6731-FL820
Motorcraft FL-820S
Royal Purple
Purolator PureOne PL24651
K&N HP-2010

Group 2 (Filters I might use)

Fleetguard LF16002
Denso 150-1014
Amsoil Ea011
Wix 51372
Mobil 1 M1-210

Group 3 (Filters I'd rather not use)

Donaldson P550965
Motorcraft MFL-820
Bosch 3410
Purolator Premium Plus L24651
Fleetguard LF3681
Hastings LF110 (aka Baldwin B329 / Casite CF-110)

Group 4 (Filters I won't use)

Pro-Tec 159
Pep Boys ProLine PPL-24651
C.G.Enterprises Viper 2 Oil Filter
Advance Auto Totalgrip AA2
Fram TG2
Fram PH2
Walmart ST2
STP S2
ACDelco PF1250


I found the same results at Bob is the Oil Guy and the Oil Bible sites,

Motorcraft is Superior to Mobil 1..

The Following are specs of four of the most popular Filters for the Mustang, I decided to put them to the test

Last edited by 2k05gt; 11-19-2010 at 11:22 PM.
2k05gt is offline  
Old 11-19-2010, 11:10 PM
  #32  
2k05gt
4th Gear Member
 
2k05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,249
Default

Royal Purple and Mobil 1 Filters are made by Champian Labs and are constructed very simular

Royal Purple (20-820)

Measurements
  • Filter Weight - 17.2 oz
  • Overall OD - 3.68"
  • Overall Height - 3.85"
  • Can Material - 0.03" thick steel
  • Filter Element OD - 3.40"
  • Filter Element Height - 2.80"
  • Media - Synthetic (appears pink/orange)
  • Number of pleats - 72 + 1 joint
  • Depth of pleats - 0.75"
  • Media length (unrolled) - 100.0"
  • Media width (glue not included) - 2.0"
  • Media thickness - 0.030"
  • Total media surface area - 265 sq. in.
  • Total media volume - 8.0 cu. in.
  • Inner Filter Support Material - 0.020" Thick Perforated Steel
  • Inner Filter Support OD - 1.66"
  • Indentifying marks
    Top Can- 111408H1 / Product of USA / Producto De EUA
    Base - ZZ
  • Gasket Retention - Press Fit
  • Thread - M22 -1.5
  • Relief Valve Location - dome end
  • ADBV Material - Nitrile Rubber (purple)
  • Gasket includes lubricant
The Royal Purple (20-820) Surpasses all in Filtration and Quality This Filter is Manufactured at Champian Labs and is advertised as an upgraded Mobil 1 Filter
and has the highest Micron Filtration rating 20um 99.5% Efficiency 8 Micron Rating overall, Stronger Case 300PSI and More Media that Mobil 1
100% synthetic micro-glass wire backed media and has a 12,000 mile extended drain rating for use with 100% Synthetic Oil.


MOBIL 1 (M1-210)

Measurements
  • Filter Weight - 16.8 oz
  • Overall OD - 3.67"
  • Overall Height - 3.71"
  • Can Material - 0.02" thick steel
  • Filter Element OD - 3.36"
  • Filter Element Height - 2.57"
  • Media - Synthetic (appears pink/orange)
  • Number of pleats - 55 + 1 joint
  • Depth of pleats - 0.72"
  • Media length (unrolled) - 89.3"
  • Media width (glue not included) - 2.1"
  • Media thickness - 0.030"
  • Total media surface area - 187 sq. in.
  • Total media volume - 5.6 cu. in.
  • Inner Filter Support Material - 0.015" Thick Perforated Steel
  • Inner Filter Support OD - 1.66"
  • Indentifying marks
    Can - 06190602 / Product of USA
    ADBV - AAX / 40
    Base - ZZ
  • Gasket Retention - Press Fit
  • Thread - M22 -1.5
  • Relief Valve Location - dome end
  • ADBV Material - Silicone (orange)
  • Gasket includes lubricant
This Filter is Manufactured at Champian Labs and has the a Micron Filtration rating 99.2% Efficiency @ 25um with a mixed synthetic media.10 Micron Rating


Motorcraft Filters are built at
Motorcraft FL-820S

Measurements
  • Filter Weight - 13.1 oz
  • Overall OD - 3.76" @ seam / 3.66 @ can
  • Overall Height - 4.05"
  • Can Material - 0.02" thick steel
  • Filter Element OD - 3.25"
  • Filter Element Height - 2.51"
  • Media - Cellulose (appears pink/orange)
  • Number of pleats - 43 + 1 joint
  • Depth of pleats - 0.68"
  • Media length (unrolled) - 65.5"
  • Media width (glue not included) - 2.375"
  • Media thickness - 0.035"
  • Total media surface area - 156 sq. in.
  • Total media volume - 5.4 cu. in.
  • Inner Filter Support Material - 0.012" Thick Perforated Steel
  • Inner Filter Support OD - 1.68"
  • Indentifying marks
    Can - Made in USA
    ADBV - 6944453 / AAX / 150
  • Gasket Retention - Multiple Crimps
  • Thread - M22-1.5
  • Relief Valve Location - base end
  • ADBV Material - Silicone (orange)
This Filter is Manufactured at Purolator Labs and has the Micron Filtration rating 10um 80% Efficiency
Is a Cheap Alternative Pure one Filter with better construction and internal parts and the Valve is located
in the base where Ford Recommends for the 3 and 4 Valve engines.


Ford Racing (CM-6731-FL820)

Measurements
  • Filter Weight - 19.75 oz
  • Can OD - 3.68" / Seam OD - 3.76"
  • Overall Height - 3.99"
  • Can Material - 0.019" thick steel
  • Filter Element OD - 3.44" (at element)
  • Filter Element Height - 2.81"
  • Media - Cellulose - Synthetic Mix? Oiled? (appears orange)
  • Number of pleats - 63 + 1 joint
  • Depth of pleats - 0.73"
  • Media length (unrolled) - 100" (seam crimped)
  • Media width (glue not included) - 2.50"
  • Media thickness - 0.029"
  • Total media surface area - 250 sq. in.
  • Total media volume - 7.25 cu. in.
  • Inner Filter Support Material - 0.010" Thick Perforated Steel
  • Inner Filter Support OD - 1.71"
  • Indentifying marks
    Can - 810050516 / Made in USA
    Bar Code - 7_56122_07567_8
    Label - 6945234
    Base - 22 / MM
  • Gasket Retention - Multiple Crimps
  • Thread - M22-1.5
  • Relief Valve Location - base end
  • ADBV Material - Silicon
Surpasses other Motorcraft Filters in Filtration and Quality This Filter is Manufactured at Purolator Labs and has the Micron Filtration rating 20um 99% Efficiency Valve Also in the Base, Highly Recommended by Ford for 3 and 4 Valve Engines. (The benefit being oil doesn't wash over the outer dirty oil/silk in the media on the inlet side when in the filter is in bypass keeping a cleaner flow of oil) By far one of the best filters under $14

Last edited by 2k05gt; 11-19-2010 at 11:32 PM.
2k05gt is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 04:07 PM
  #33  
Supercharged99
Thread Starter
 
Supercharged99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jacksonville,Florida
Posts: 27
Default

great info!
Supercharged99 is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 04:10 PM
  #34  
Supercharged99
Thread Starter
 
Supercharged99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jacksonville,Florida
Posts: 27
Default

where can i pick up the group one filters? ive already put a filter on from the group 4 the oil in using is to expensive to change again so ill have to be easy on it till nextg oil change
Supercharged99 is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 07:17 PM
  #35  
ShadyNinja
4th Gear Member
 
ShadyNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,257
Default

If you are talking about "All Out Contaminate Removal"
I would rank the Royal Purple just below the Amsoil oil filter

Royal Purple Oil Filter

with 99% filtration efficiency at 25 microns.


Amsoil Oil Filter

EaO Filters provide a filtering efficiency in accordance with industry standard ISO 4548-12 of 98.7 percent at 15 microns

Data copied and pasted from each company's website.

its splitting hairs but just thought you should know.
ShadyNinja is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 10:02 PM
  #36  
Unleashedbeast
4th Gear Member
 
Unleashedbeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,465
Default

The AMSOIL EaO11 oil filter is by far the most advanced oil filter ever manufactured in the world, hands down. The state of the art patented nano-fiber synthetic media is able to filter down to 15 microns yet still flow as well as the best of them. This is one filter that can take any crap out of your oil and still flow as much than the most free flowing filters on the market.

I won't use anything else.
Unleashedbeast is offline  
Old 11-21-2010, 12:26 AM
  #37  
JAJ
2nd Gear Member
 
JAJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by Unleashedbeast
This is a false statement, very much so when considering that all API SM/SN certified lubricants have very low amounts of ZDDP content. Everything you find on the "over the counter" shelf as other are calling it, will have very low amounts of ZDDP. ZDDP content has been proven to protect an engines internals far superior to any of the oils mentioned previously ...
Arguing that an SL oil with ZDDP is better than SM/SN oil is like arguing that fiberglass is superior to carbon fiber because it contains "real glass". ZDDP certainly works, but it's pretty much obsolete except for a few engine designs that are also obsolete. Modern anti-wear and anti-oxidant additives are organic and have no metallic signatures. The absence of zinc and phosporus in an engine oil doesn't signify "weak", it signifies "upgraded".

Then there's the UOA issue. Metal readings in used oil analyses are meaningless unless they're over 100ppm. A UOA tells you the condition of the oil, not the engine.

And, while I'm being controversial, Group IV oil formulations are not superior to Group III formulations, except for (again) a few cases. The main difference between Gr IV and Gr III is oxidative stability. The "dirty little secret" of Gr IV basestocks is that they don't dissolve additives properly, making it necessary to blend in a shot Gr I or Gr 2 (low-end-conventional) basestock so the additives will stay dissolved. Gr IV with Gr II blended in is no more "pure" than a Gr III.

The special cases where Gr IV is superior to Gr III are the Gr IV/V blends that are pure racing oils. They're not recommended (by any of the manufacturers that make them including Redline) for use on the street. They do have superior film strength and they don't shear under heavy load, but they're not a solution for your daily driver.

Last edited by JAJ; 11-21-2010 at 12:33 AM.
JAJ is offline  
Old 11-21-2010, 05:10 AM
  #38  
Unleashedbeast
4th Gear Member
 
Unleashedbeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by JAJ
Arguing that an SL oil with ZDDP is better than SM/SN oil is like arguing that fiberglass is superior to carbon fiber because it contains "real glass". ZDDP certainly works, but it's pretty much obsolete except for a few engine designs that are also obsolete. Modern anti-wear and anti-oxidant additives are organic and have no metallic signatures. The absence of zinc and phosporus in an engine oil doesn't signify "weak", it signifies "upgraded"

Ummm, yeah....try convincing that to someone who has SEEN first person what the new Mobil 1 API SM formulation are doing to the camshafts in a "modern" 3V Ford modular engine. Try to convince those who switched back to an API SL formulation noticed decreased ppm of wear metals in their UOAs. Try convincing AMSOIL, Red Line, and Royal Purple of this also.

Your argument is laughable to say the least. The new "replacement" additives are FAIL, and if they weren't, the aforementioned companies would have jumped on the bandwagon and began using the "upgraded" additive you hold so highly. Seriously, stop reading things at BITOG and believing that everything over there is fact, and that everyone who posts there are experts.

Originally Posted by JAJ
Then there's the UOA issue. Metal readings in used oil analyses are meaningless unless they're over 100ppm. A UOA tells you the condition of the oil, not the engine.
So you are saying, a normal UOA that shows 10 ppm content of any wear metal, then they change formulations, and the next UOA shows the same content @ 80 ppm. In your logic, I shouldn't be concerned about it because it's less than 100 ppm. You say it's the condition of the oil? REALLY? Was the oil formulated with iron, copper, and aluminum? Trust me, the condition of the oil when wear metals are concerned is DEFINITELY an engine concern.

WOW! Can I have some of the drugs you pour into the kool aid you are drinking?

Originally Posted by JAJ
The "dirty little secret" of Gr IV basestocks is that they don't dissolve additives properly, making it necessary to blend in a shot Gr I or Gr 2 (low-end-conventional) basestock so the additives will stay dissolved. Gr IV with Gr II blended in is no more "pure" than a Gr III.
OK genius, I've heard this one too, and even if a group III oil is superior in the solubility attributes, then how do you explain a group IV trapping just as much contamination in the oil filter. That's right, the oil pressure and movement of the fluid itself push the contaminates to the filter. Seriously, I've seen engines torn down using NO group III base stock (only group IV) and there were less particles found than your average group III. This is still a debated topic, and primarily driven by those who profit from the sale of hydrocracked petroleum. *cough* Pennzoil Ultra *cough*

Originally Posted by JAJ
The special cases where Gr IV is superior to Gr III are the Gr IV/V blends that are pure racing oils. They're not recommended (by any of the manufacturers that make them including Redline) for use on the street. They do have superior film strength and they don't shear under heavy load, but they're not a solution for your daily driver.
The only major differences from race oil to street oil is the additive package (when AMSOIL is concerned).

I'm really rolling my eyes at you this time. Go back to BITOG and dig up more BS to call fact.

Last edited by Unleashedbeast; 11-21-2010 at 05:15 AM.
Unleashedbeast is offline  
Old 11-21-2010, 10:44 AM
  #39  
ShadyNinja
4th Gear Member
 
ShadyNinja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,257
Default

Hey JAJ happy 10th post and welcome to MF troll
ShadyNinja is offline  
Old 11-21-2010, 11:13 AM
  #40  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by JAJ
Arguing that an SL oil with ZDDP is better than SM/SN oil is like arguing that fiberglass is superior to carbon fiber because it contains "real glass". ZDDP certainly works, but it's pretty much obsolete except for a few engine designs that are also obsolete. Modern anti-wear and anti-oxidant additives are organic and have no metallic signatures. The absence of zinc and phosporus in an engine oil doesn't signify "weak", it signifies "upgraded".

Then there's the UOA issue. Metal readings in used oil analyses are meaningless unless they're over 100ppm. A UOA tells you the condition of the oil, not the engine.

And, while I'm being controversial, Group IV oil formulations are not superior to Group III formulations, except for (again) a few cases. The main difference between Gr IV and Gr III is oxidative stability. The "dirty little secret" of Gr IV basestocks is that they don't dissolve additives properly, making it necessary to blend in a shot Gr I or Gr 2 (low-end-conventional) basestock so the additives will stay dissolved. Gr IV with Gr II blended in is no more "pure" than a Gr III.

The special cases where Gr IV is superior to Gr III are the Gr IV/V blends that are pure racing oils. They're not recommended (by any of the manufacturers that make them including Redline) for use on the street. They do have superior film strength and they don't shear under heavy load, but they're not a solution for your daily driver.
Factual and well put forth--here's a real welcome to the forum!

-cliff-

A tip though: Don't waste your time trying to sway the faithful (of any denomination) with facts and hard evidence--it just labels you as a non-believer and infidel--and has no effect upon their faith.
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: oil question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 PM.