Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

Mustang Vs Camaro Vs Challenger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2009, 03:12 PM
  #11  
Texotic
5th Gear Member
 
Texotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 2,179
Default

I just can't wait to see if the rumors are true about the 2011 Stang getting the 400/400 5.0L 4V Coyote V8.
Texotic is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 03:15 PM
  #12  
blksunshine
 
blksunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 45
Default

Now that's a good rumor.
blksunshine is offline  
Old 05-20-2009, 03:38 PM
  #13  
Texotic
5th Gear Member
 
Texotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 2,179
Default

I hadn't checked on that rumor in a while, but I just checked up on it and, turns out, it has been confirmed. There's also speculation that the EcoBoost V6 may be made as an alternative engine. This engine is also supposed to be slightly smaller and lighter than the current 4.6L. So... if the Stang was this close with a 315hp 4.6L and a 5-Speed, imagine it with a 400hp 5.0L and a 6-Speed. Keep in mind it shouldn't be any heavier. Good Bye, Camaro.

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/18/r...ote-v8-coming/
Texotic is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 08:42 AM
  #14  
dvs4.6
2nd Gear Member
 
dvs4.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 162
Default

licking my chops and saving for that down payment on the 2011 with the 5.0. it's gonna be like the mid to late 80's all over again. i think i just gave away my age. either way it is going to be awesome. "IRS...who needs a stinking IRS?"
dvs4.6 is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 02:22 PM
  #15  
Argonaut
4th Gear Member
 
Argonaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 1,778
Default

So do you think the automakers can create V8s that get > 39 mpg? As just announced by Pres Obama, by 2016 the fleet average for cars is to be > 39 mpg. The 39MPG is a ave across the fleet...so maybe each manuf will have a few cars that V8s in the future but I wouldn't be surprised if right now is the golden age of the big V8 and we see a decline in the future (smaller displacement or perhaps highly boosted engines). All I can say is I'm glad I have two relatively new Muscle cars now, there might not be as much muscle in the future, or if there is its likely not due to displacement. Time will tell.
Argonaut is offline  
Old 08-26-2009, 01:31 AM
  #16  
desslok40
3rd Gear Member
 
desslok40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 632
Default

No Camaro's at track yet, have to wait till it cools down, went up against a Challenger SRT8 last spring, he got owned, the car looks great but at 425 HP you would think it would have some *****, its does but unfortunately they weigh 4100 lbs !!! lol

I think the Camaro SS will beat us at 1/4 but not by much and for $$ 12k more I will keep my S197.
desslok40 is offline  
Old 08-27-2009, 04:02 PM
  #17  
heartinacage
3rd Gear Member
 
heartinacage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 782
Default

I've seen all of them up close and on the highway. They're all nice cars. I actually prefer the Challenger out of all of them though.
heartinacage is offline  
Old 08-28-2009, 07:37 PM
  #18  
Murphdog
3rd Gear Member
 
Murphdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 552
Default

I'll take one Challenger and one Camaro! IMO they both have done good getting that retro style back. The Camaro looks the best between the 2.
Murphdog is offline  
Old 08-29-2009, 01:15 AM
  #19  
giantkaiser
 
giantkaiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Argonaut
So do you think the automakers can create V8s that get > 39 mpg? As just announced by Pres Obama, by 2016 the fleet average for cars is to be > 39 mpg. The 39MPG is a ave across the fleet...so maybe each manuf will have a few cars that V8s in the future but I wouldn't be surprised if right now is the golden age of the big V8 and we see a decline in the future (smaller displacement or perhaps highly boosted engines). All I can say is I'm glad I have two relatively new Muscle cars now, there might not be as much muscle in the future, or if there is its likely not due to displacement. Time will tell.
The one thing that will come out good for the future is that cars are going to have to get lighter to meet these standards, while also keeping safety at the top of the list.

I think we are at or near the 'peak' of the new muscle car age, so enjoy it while it lasts.

I wouldn't mind seeing a sub 3000lb mustang again (1965 anyone?) with a modern 260ci V8 that revs to 7000+ rpms !!

Last edited by giantkaiser; 08-29-2009 at 01:17 AM.
giantkaiser is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bokeo
Street/Strip
7
03-14-2016 09:33 PM
Insidian
New Member Area
6
08-17-2015 08:50 PM
chain
New Member Area
6
08-17-2015 08:52 AM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM
whatsup62
5.0L GT S550 Tech
3
08-11-2015 08:45 AM



Quick Reply: Mustang Vs Camaro Vs Challenger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM.