Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

Front end alignment after installing Steeda Sport Springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2012, 07:24 AM
  #1  
dcarlinf1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dcarlinf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oldham County, Kentucky
Posts: 540
Question Front end alignment after installing Steeda Sport Springs

So, I installed a set Steeda Sport Springs, Koni STR.T shocks/struts and a pair of GT500 strut mounts recently. And, this weekend I finally got around to getting it aligned. Below are the before and after specs. The items in bold exceeded Ford's recommendations.

Before:

LF Camber -1.5, RF Camber -1.8
LF Caster 7.3, RF Camber 7.3
LF Toe -0.09, RF Toe -0.23
Total Toe -0.33
Steer Ahead 0.07


After:

LF Camber -1.4, RF Camber -1.4
LF Caster 7.3, RF Camber 7.3
LF Toe 0.09, RF Toe 0.09
Total Toe 0.17
Steer Ahead 0.00

While I like how good a job the tech did in getting everything within spec and identical side to side, the fact that I am now running with the camber at -1.4 concerns me a little. This is only .1 degree within spec. I've read about the pros and cons of running an aggressive camber, but I wonder if I should try to dial it back some using camber bolts. What do you guys think? The car is primarily a DD with the occasional spirited driving thru the twisties

Dave
dcarlinf1 is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:36 AM
  #2  
gmoran1469
3rd Gear Member
 
gmoran1469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 738
Default

I thought -1.4 was less camber than -1.5, meaning it's less aggressive. I could be wrong though.

Also, were you in the car when he aligned it? Doesn't make sense that both settings would be the same when accounting for driver weight.
gmoran1469 is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 08:26 AM
  #3  
dcarlinf1
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dcarlinf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oldham County, Kentucky
Posts: 540
Default

Yes, -1.4 is less aggressive than -1.5. But, I've read on here that -1.2 is considered somewhat aggressive. But, I could be wrong also

I was not in the car.
dcarlinf1 is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 12:32 PM
  #4  
gmoran1469
3rd Gear Member
 
gmoran1469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 738
Default

I run -1.5 and it's pretty aggressive, on wider tires the wear on the inside is less than with the stock tires. On my stockers the inside fronts got worn down pretty quickly on street tires.
gmoran1469 is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 12:49 PM
  #5  
Derf00
Gentleman's Relish
 
Derf00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,090
Default

http://www.ozebiz.com.au/racetech/theory/align.html

You are fine, the fact the tech made them both equal and the fact they reduced the camber means you'll end up with a little less wear on the inside tread of the tires and also smoother transitions throught he twisties (depending on your overall suspension).

Lowering springs usually means less up/down travel of the suspension so if you have a high negative camber you may never get full contact of the tire to the road going through a corner. (bottom of the article says it all).
Derf00 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drfister
2005-2014 Mustangs
11
05-03-2018 10:38 PM
Urambo Tauro
New Member Area
12
12-17-2016 03:30 PM
svastano
2005-2009 S197 Appearance Section
25
07-16-2016 01:20 PM
spectreman
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
23
03-31-2016 09:26 PM
mikecaputo
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
0
08-22-2015 10:58 AM



Quick Reply: Front end alignment after installing Steeda Sport Springs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.